Jural Classes

Shri Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia V. State of Punjab, AIR 1980 SC 1632

Bihar Judiciary Interview Official Notification

AchpaL@Ramswaroop & Ors. V. State of Rajasthan (Cri. Appeal No. 1218 of 2018), Supreme Court held that if the chargesheet was returned by Magistrate on technical grounds, then, U/S 167(2) of CRPC, the accused is entitled to get bail.

Sushila AggarwaL v. State of NCT Delhi (2020) 5 SCC 1, Supreme court held that protection under Anticipatory Bail U/S- 438 of CRPC should not be fixed for limited period.

Former Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Andhra Bank, was in April 2020 appointed as the Vigilance Commissioner. Mr. Patel, former Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Andhra Bank, who was appointed as the vigilance commissioner in April 2020, was officiating as the Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) since June 2022. President Droupadi Murmu administered the Oath of Office to the Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) Shri Suresh N Patel at Rashtrapati Bhavan on 03-Aug-2022.

S.Kashi v. State through
Inspector of Police (2020) SCC Online SC 529, Supreme Court held that extension of limitation due to lock- down not applicable to the period of filing Charge-Sheet u/s-167(2) of CRPC.

Arnesh Kumar V. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273, Supreme court held that Police Officers do not arrest accused unnecessarily and Magistrate do not authorise detentions casually.

Siddharth Mukesh Bhandari Vs. State of Gujarat, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1044 OF 2022, Supreme court held that High Court, while exercising powers under Section 482 CrPC, can grant stay of investigation or any other interim relief only in the rarest of rare cases.

Lalita kumari V. Govt. Of U.P. 2013 (13) scale 559, Supreme court held that registration of F.I.R is mandatory U/S 154 of CRPC, if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence.
Categories of cases in which preliminary inquiry may be made are as under:
a) Matrimonial disputes/family disputes.
b) Commercial offences.
c) Medical negligence cases.
D) Corruption Cases.
E) Cases where there is abnormal delay.

C. Magesh V. State Of Karnataka, AIR 2010 SC 2768, Supreme court held that Fir was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate it's maker.

Madhu limaye V. S.D.M. Monghyr (1971) AIR 2186, Supreme court held that Section 144 of crpc is constitutionally valid.

State of Haryana V. Dinesh Kumar Appeal (Civil) 84 of (2008), Supreme court held that arrest implies apprehension of the accused by the police officer or the submission of the accused to custody by word or action including when he is in the judicial custody on surrender before the court and/or submits to its direction.

Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. Vs. Union of India (2018) 10 SCC 1, Supreme Court held that Section 377 of IPC held Unconstitutional to that extent it criminalizes consensual homosexual acts in private. Supreme Court over-ruled it's previous Judgement Suresh Kumar Kaushal Vs. Naz Foundation.

Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. Vs. Union of India (2018), Supreme Court held that Section 377 of IPC held Unconstitutional to that extent it criminalizes consensual homosexual acts in private. Supreme Court over-ruled it's previous Judgement Suresh Kumar Kaushal Vs. Naz Foundation.

Mrs. Neelam Katara V. Union of India (2003), Delhi High court Has giveN guidelines for the protection of the witnesses...

Mrs. Neelam Katara V. Union of India (2003), Delhi High court given guidelines for the protection of the witnesses...

Siddharth v. State of U.p (2021), Supreme court held that section-170 of CRPC does not impose an obligation on the officer-in-charge to arrest each and every accused at the time of filing of the charge sheet.

Satender kumar antil v. Cbi (2022),
Supreme Court given latest guidelines on arrests and bail orders. Main 3 Guidelines are:
1. Direction for seperate enactment in the nature of bail act.
2. Non Compliance of S-41 and 41A of crpc would entitle accuse for grant bail.
3. Bail applications to be disposed of within a period of 2 weeks except if the provision mandate otherwise,with exception being an intervening application.applications for anticipatory bail are expected to be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks with the exception of any intervening application.

Youth bar association of India v. Union of india (2016), Supreme Court Held that the copies of the First information reports should be uploaded on the police website.

Vinubhai haribhai malaviya v. State of gujarat (2019), Supreme Court Held that magistrate can invoke power u/s 156(3) even at post cognizance stage.

State of U.P & Anr. Vs. Akhil Sharda & Others (2022), Supreme Court held that High Court cannot conduct mini trial while deciding application U/S - 482 of CRPC.

Gautam Navlakha v. National Investigation Agency: Magistrate has power to order house arrest U/S 167
Criminal Procedure Code.

Do you want to be a Judge? Come join us on the journey of making our Dreams Comes True...