Kashif Judicial Academy

( PLJ 2022 Cr.C. 257 )

without permission; offence u/s 6(5)(6) of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, can only be tried by the Family Court.
PLJ 2022 Cr.C. 257
[Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench]
Present: Muhammad Amjad Rafiq, J.
MUZAFFAR NAWAZ--Petitioner
versus
ISHRAT RASOOL and another--Respondents
Crl. Rev. No. 168 of 2019, heard on 13.9.2021.
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)--
----Ss. 435/439--Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, (VIII of 1961),
S. 6(5)(b)--W.P. Family Courts Act, ( # # of 1964), S. 20--Petitioner contracted second marriage during the existence of first wife, without the permission of the first wife--complaint was marked to the magistrate section 30 who after trial, convicted the petitioner--S. 5 & 20 has not been altered, repealed or amended by the competent authority, as such, the same is in vogue and applicable with all force--Only the family Court had the jurisdiction to try a complaint under S. 6(5)(b) of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961; trial conducted by the magistrate was blatant violation of Article 175(2) of the constitution--Magistrate has erroneously assumed the jurisdiction, hence, the trial stands vitiated--Criminal Revision is allowed--Judgments of both the Courts below set aside and all the proceedings conducted by these Courts are quashed. [Pp. 258 & 261] A, F, G, H & I
Appeal--
----Jurisdiction error--If there was some error in the forum of trial, the same stood rectified in appeal before the learned appellate Court.
[P. 259] B
1992 MLD 93; PLD 2017 SC 187; 1993 SCMR 1901; PLD 1991 Lahore 247; PLD 1985 Lahore 165 ref.
West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 ( # # of 1964)--
----S. 5--Word “Exclusive” used in s. 5 makes it vividly clear that no other Court can assume jurisdiction in respect of provisions of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance except the constituted under the West Pakistan Family Courts act, 1964. [P. 260] C
West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 ( # # of 1964)--
----S. 5--Jurisdiction--Criminal proceedings--Only the Family Court can assume the jurisdiction in some offences of, PPC as mentioned in Part II of the Schedule, if committed against the spouses. [P. 260] D
West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 ( # # of 1964)--
----S. 20--Criminal procedure code, 1898--S. 20 of West Pakistan family Courts act, 1964 was authorized to act as Magistrate of 1st class under code of criminal procedure, 1898. [P. 260] E
Malik Imtiaz Mahmood Awan, Advocate with Petitioner.
Mr. Muhammad Latif, Additional Prosecutor General for State.
Hafiz Khaliq Ditta Langah, Advocate for Respondent.
Date of hearing: 13.9.2021.
Judgment
Briefly the facts of the case giving rise to the instant criminal revision are that Mst. Ishrat Rasool/Respondent No. 1, as first wife of Muzaffar Nawaz accused/ petitioner, filed a private complaint under Section 6 (5)(b) of The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 against said Muzaffar Nawaz contending that she contracted marriage with him on 02.09.2013, during subsistence of that marriage and without getting her permission, Muzaffar Nawaz contracted another marriage with Mst. Sitara Jabeen on 15.04.2015. The said complaint was marked to the Magistrate Section 30, Rahim Yar Khan, who after recording cursory evidence, summoned the accused, framed the charge, recorded evidence of respective parties and on conclusion of trial vide judgment dated 17.05.2019 convicted the accused/petitioner under Section 6(5)(b) of The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 and sentenced him to simple imprisonment for three months with fine of five hundred thousand rupees, in case of default in payment of fine, the accused was to further suffer simple imprisonment for two months. Against his said conviction and sentence, the accused/petitioner filed an appeal before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rahim Yar Khan, which was dismissed vide judgment dated 12.09.2019, hence, the instant criminal revision.
2. The main stance of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the complaint filed by the respondent could only be tried by the Family Court and not by a Magistrate and here in this case as the complaint was tried by a Magistrate, who had no jurisdiction in the matter, therefore, the entire proceedings including the trial would stand vitiated.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel for complainant/ respondent opposed the above arguments and contended that even if there was some error in the forum of trial, the same stood rectified in appeal before the learned appellate Court. In support of his contentions learned counsel placed reliance on the case “Naseem Akhtar Durrani versus Mst. Abida Sultan and 3 others” (1992 MLD 93), “Ishtiaq Ahmad versus The State and others” (PLD 2017 SC 187), “Bshrat Iqbal versus The State and another” (1993 SCMR 1901)’ “Shaukat Ali versus Kalsoom Akhtar and another” (PLD 1991 Lahore 247) and “Mst. Fauzia Hussain versus Mian Khadim Hussain” (PLD 1985 Lahore 165).
4. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties, the moot point here in this case turns out to be that what would be the proper forum to try a complaint under Section 6(5)(b) of The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 i.e. a Judicial Magistrate simplicitor or necessarily it be a Judge Family Court who may also enjoy the powers of a Judicial Magistrate, as required by Section 20 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 (amended by Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance 2002)? Before proceeding further relevant provisions i.e. Section 5 and Section 20 (as amended by Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance 2002) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, are reproduced here under:
S.5. Jurisdiction--- [(1)] Subject to the provisions of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, and the Conciliation Courts Ordinance, 1961, the Family Courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction to entertain, hear and adjudicate upon matters specified in [Part I of the Schedule.”]
[(2)] Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act V of 1898), the Family Court shall have jurisdiction to try the offences specified in Part II of the Schedule, where one of the spouses is victim of an offence committed by the other.
(3) The High Court may with approval of the Government, amend the schedule so as to alter, delete or add any entry thereto.”]
Section 20 (as amended by Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance 2002)
[Section 20. Family Court as Judicial Magistrate. - (1) A Family Court shall be deemed as the Judicial Magistrate of the first class under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898) for taking cognizance and trial of any offence under this Act; the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 (VII of 1961), and the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 (XIX of 1929).
(2) A Family Court shall conduct the trial of an offence under subsection (1) in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XXII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898) relating to the summary trial.
(3) An offence other than contempt of a Family Court shall be cognizable on the complaint of the Union Council, Arbitration Council or the aggrieved party.]
The intention of legislature reflected from the amendment introduced above is to fold all family affairs under an umbrella so that sanctity of family affairs and dignity of spouses could be saved from public exposure in ordinary Courts. The word “exclusive” used in Section 5 makes it vividly clear that no other Court can assume jurisdiction in respect of provisions of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance except the Court constituted under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964; it is further clarified that only family Court can assume jurisdiction in some offences of PPC as mentioned in Part II of the Schedule, if committed against the spouses. It was the reason that under Section 20 Family Court was authorized to act as Magistrate of 1st Class under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. At this stage, the Court would like to specifically refer sub-Article (2) of Article 270AA of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, inserted by way of Eighteenth Amendment Act, X of 2010, which reads as under:
“270AA (2). Except as provided in clause (1) and subject to the provisions of the Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 2010, all other laws including President’s Order, Acts,

Ordinances, Chief Executive’s Orders, regulations, enactments, notifications, rules, orders or bye-laws made between the twelfth day of October, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine and the thirty-first day of October, two thousand and three (both days inclusive) and still in force shall, continue to be in force until altered, repealed or amended by the competent authority.”
In the presence of above specific saving clause, this Court has been informed that Section 5 and 20 (as amended by Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance 2002 (LV of 2002) has not been altered, repealed or amended by the competent authority, as such, the same is in vogue and applicable with all force. Furthermore, Article 175(2) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 in clear terms provides that:
“No Court shall have any jurisdiction save as is or may be conferred on it by the Constitution or by or under any law.”
Therefore, once it is settled that per force of Section 20 (as amended by Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance 2002) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, only the family Court had the jurisdiction to try a complaint under Section 6(5)(b) of The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961; trial conducted by the Magistrate was blatant violation of Article 175(2) of the Constitution, as reproduced above.
5. As a corollary, the offence under Section 6(5)(b) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 would only be tried by family Court constituted under West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. The Magistrate has erroneously assumed the jurisdiction; hence, the trial stands vitiated. Consequently, the instant criminal revision is allowed, the judgments of both the Courts below are set-aside and all the proceedings conducted by these Courts are quashed.
Regards' ⚖️

فوجداری مقدمے کی کارروائی کے اقدامات:

(1) -ایف آئی آر 154 یا براہ راست شکایت 200

(2) -تفتیش 156 یا انکوائری 202۔

(3) -بیان اور اعتراف کا ریکارڈ 161،164

(4) جسمانی یا پولیس ریمانڈ 167 ، ، ، 344…)

(5) مندرجہ ذیل طریقوں کے تحت ، 173 کے چالان جمع کرانے؛
دفعہ 169 - جب ثبوت کی کمی ہو تو ملزم کی رہائی
دفعہ 170-کیس مجسٹریٹ کو ارسال کیا جائے جب شواہد کافی ہوں تو ملزم کی عدم موجودگی میں شواہد کا 512 ریکارڈ

(6) ایف آئی آر کا خاتمہ… 561 A)

(7) ادراک 190

(8) 204،204 عمل جاری کرنا ،

(9) ناقابل ضمانت 496 غیر ضمانت 497 ..

(10) 221 سے 240 تک چارج کی فریمنگ ..

(11) تیز بری 249 اے ، 265 کے ، ، 561 اے…
پراسیکیوٹر اور ملزم کے وکیل کی سماعت کے بعد اور وجوہات ریکارڈ کیئے جائیں ..)

(12) قصور وار… .. 243 ،،،، 265 ای…
استغاثہ کے ثبوتوں کا آغاز…
ملزم کا امتحان 342 ……
دفاعی ثبوتوں کا آغاز ..340
ثبوت پیش کرنا….

*فیصلہ*…
(2) 245 / 265H بری…
یا سزا 245 (2) ، 265 ایچ(2)
اپیل
(1) اسسٹنٹ سیشن جج یا جوڈیشل مجسٹریٹیو سیکشن 408 کے ذریعہ منظور شدہ سزا کے خلاف عدالت کے سیشن میں اپیل
(2) سیشن یا ایڈیشنل سیشن جج سیکشن 410 کے ذریعہ منظور شدہ سزا کے خلاف ہائی کورٹ میں اپیل ....

فیملی لاء رولز 2020 کے تحت نکاح رجسٹر ار کو ہدایات جاری...

#2021 MLD 4.
489-F--Dishonestly issuing a cheque---Pre-arrest bail, grant of---Scope---Accused was alleged to have issued a cheque which was dishonoured on its presentation---Cheque was issued to the complainant for the consideration that he would take back the suit filed by him against the accused and not for repayment of a loan or fulfilment of any monetary obligation---Whether liability of the accused for the alleged offence was punishable under S.489-F, P.P.C. would be determined by the Trial Court after recording of evidence---Investigation of the case had already been concluded---Sending the accused behind the bars would not serve any useful purpose and would cause irreparable loss to his reputation---Petition for grant of pre-arrest bail was allowed, in circumstances.

*2021 MLD 691*
Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---
----Ss. *324, 337-D & 34* --Attempt to commit qatl-l-amd, jaifah, common intention---Appreciation of Evidence---Statement of witnesses--- Consistence--Scope--Prosecution case was that the accused and his co-accused stopped the nephew of complainant and fired at him whereby he sustained injury on left side of his chest---Dispute over the thoroughfare was mentioned as the motive behind the occurrence--- Perusal of the record would reveal that the occurrence had taken place in daylight wherein injured sustained firearm injury by the firing of present accused in presence of eye-witnesses out of whom complainant appeared before the court as witness whereas the injured himself appeared in the witness box, being victim of the same occurrence by sustaining firearm injury on his person--Presence of the injured at the spot was established without any doubt---Statement of injured being worth credence could not be discarded on the basis of minor contradictions which did happen with the passage of time--Statement of complainant corroborated the narrations of the injured witness-- Statement of both the said witnesses were consistent on material particulars of the occurrence and there was no reason for them to implicate an innocent person in the case---Testimony of said witnesses was rightly relied upon by Trial Court for convicting the accused--- Circumstances established that could not make out a case for interference in the impugned judgment, therefore appeal, being devoid of merits, was Dismissed, in Circumstances.
Regards' Kashif Sahito Advocate High Court. ⚖️

There are 4 Stages of Crime as under :
1) intention
2) perparation
3) attempt
4) Accomplishment/ Commission

1. INTENTION

The first important stage of crime is intention. Intention is main element by which a person decides to commit an offence. A mind of a person decides to commit crime, as per law it is said that a person should have mens rea. Mens Rea means perparation commission which a crime is committed. If person have no mens rea he can not be said to have intention for commission of offence. A man without mens rea can not be punished. So the intention is considered as important element to make person punishable. Understanding intention is not an easy task. So it is difficult to punish person based on intention alone.

2. PREPARATION

The second stage of crime is preparation. In this stage the offender have proper plan about how, when and where he is going to commit a crime. He draws the proper map of commission of crime. The proper arrangements are made in order to execute the crime. Preparatory stage in certain case are not punishable as per IPC.

3. ATTEMPT

The fourth stage of crime is attempt. Once preparatory stage is completed the person attempt to commit a crime. An attempt is the direct movement towards the commission of an offence.

4. COMMISSION

The last stage of the crime is commission/ accomplishment. This stage takes place as soon as the offender passes through all the above mention stages. In this stage the offence is successfully completed by the offender. The offender is guilty for whole offence. If the crime is not committed he will be guilty for attempt.

Therefore, it is very important to know about all four stages of crime in order to prove the accused guilty of the offence committed.


1 Intention نيت
جرم کا پہلا اہم مرحلہ نیت ہے۔ نیت بنیادی عنصر ہے جس کے ذریعہ کوئی شخص جرم کرنے کا فیصلہ کرتا ہے۔ کسی شخص کا ذہن جرم کرنے کا فیصلہ کرتا ہے ، قانون کے مطابق یہ کہا جاتا ہے کہ کسی شخص کو مینس ری ہونا چاہئے۔ مینس ریeaا کا مطلب ہے پریپریشن کمیشن جس کا ارتکاب جرم ہوتا ہے۔ اگر کسی کے پاس مینس ری نہیں ہے تو اسے جرم کے کمیشن کا ارادہ کرنے کے بارے میں نہیں کہا جاسکتا ہے۔ بغیر مرد کے کسی آدمی کو سزا نہیں دی جا سکتی۔ لہذا نیت کو انسان کو قابل سزا بنانا اہم عنصر سمجھا جاتا ہے۔ نیت کو سمجھنا کوئی آسان کام نہیں ہے۔ لہذا صرف نیت کی بنیاد پر کسی شخص کو سزا دینا مشکل ہے۔

2. تیاری perparation

جرم کا دوسرا مرحلہ تیاری ہے۔ اس مرحلے میں مجرم کے بارے میں مناسب منصوبہ ہے کہ وہ کس طرح ، کب اور کہاں جرم کرے گا۔ اس نے جرائم کے کمیشن کا مناسب نقشہ کھینچا۔ جرم کو انجام دینے کے لئے مناسب انتظامات کیے جاتے ہیں۔ آئی پی سی کے مطابق کچھ معاملات میں تیاری کا مرحلہ قابل سزا نہیں ہے۔

3. ATTEMPT کوشش

جرم کا چوتھا مرحلہ کوشش ہے۔ ایک بار جب تیاری کا مرحلہ مکمل ہوجاتا ہے تو وہ شخص جرم کرنے کی کوشش کرتا ہے۔ ایک کوشش کسی جرم کے کمیشن کی طرف براہ راست حرکت ہے۔

4۔کمیشن commission

جرم کا آخری مرحلہ کمیشن / کامیابی ہے۔ مذکورہ بالا تمام مراحل میں سے جیسے ہی مجرم گزرتا ہے یہ مرحلہ ہوتا ہے۔ اس مرحلے میں مجرم کے ذریعہ جرم کامیابی کے ساتھ مکمل ہوتا ہے۔ مجرم پورے جرم کے لئے مجرم ہے۔ اگر جرم نہیں ہوتا ہے تو وہ کوشش کے لئے مجرم ہوگا۔

لہذا ، جرم کے چاروں مراحل کے بارے میں جاننا بہت ضروری ہے تاکہ ملزم کو جرم کے مرتکب ہونے کے لئے ثابت کیا جاسکے۔

ریمانڈ اور اس کا طریقہ کار

ریمانڈ سے متعلق تفصیلات جاننے کے لئے ضابطہ فوجداری کی دفعات61، 167 اور344 کا مطالعہ ضروری ہے۔ اس کے ساتھ دفعہ62 اور دفعہ173 کا بھی مطالعہ کرنا چاہئے۔

ریمانڈ کے لفظی معنی واپس بھجوانا ہے۔ فوجداری مقدمات میں ملزم کو پھر حوالات بھیجنا مگر پولیس کے تشدد کی وجہ سے یہ اطلاع بڑی خطر ناک بن چکی ہے۔ جب کوئی شخص گرفتار ہوتا ہے تو پولیس اس کو چوبیس گھنٹے کے اندر مجسٹریٹ کے پاس پیش کرنے کی پابند ہوتی ہے اور مزید عرصے کے لئے زیر حراست رکھنا مطلوب ہو تو پولیس مجسٹریٹ سے تحریری حکم حاصل کرتی ہے اس درخواست کو ریمانڈ کی درخواست کہتے ہیں۔ اگر پولیس24 گھنٹے کے اندر ملزم کو عدالت میں پیش نہیں کرتی اور مزید مناسب حکم حاصل نہیں کرتی تو 24 گھنٹے سے بعد کی حراست غیر قانونی شمار ہوگی۔

(PLD 1960 Pesh 74)

عام طور پر ریمانڈ کی درخواست علاقہ مجسٹریٹ کو دی جاتی ہے تاہم ناگزیر صورت میں ریمانڈ کی درخواست کسی بھی مقامی مجسٹریٹ کو دی جا سکتی ہے۔ مجسٹریٹ جس کے روبرو کسی ملزم کو بغرض ریمانڈ پیش کیا جائے زیادہ سے زیادہ پندرہ دن کا ریمانڈ دے سکتا ہے۔ ہائی کورٹ رولز میں بھی ریمانڈ کے متعلق احکامات اور ہدایات دی گئی ہیں۔ ریمانڈ کی درخواستوں میں قانون یہ ہے کہ مجسٹریٹ کو ملزم کے وکیل یا اسکے رشتہ داروں کو یہ حق دینا چاہئے کہ اگر وہ Remand کے خلاف ملزم کی طرف سے عذرات پیش کرنا چاہتے ہیں تو کر سکتے ہیں۔ ہائی کورٹ کے قواعد میں درج ہے کہ مجسٹریٹ کو لازم ہے کہ وہ ملزم کو وکیل رکھنے کا موقع دے تاکہ وہ وکیل ریمانڈ کے خلاف عذرات پیش کر سکے۔

مجسٹریٹ کے لئے ضروری ہے کہ وہ اس بات کا تعین کرے کہ آیا ملزم کا پولیس کے قبضہ میں دیا جانا ضروری ہے یا نہیں۔اگر مجسٹریٹ محسوس کرے کہ ملزم کو پولیس کی حراست میں مزید رکھنا ضروری نہیں ہے تو وہ ریمانڈ کا حکم صادر کرنے سے انکار کر سکتا ہے۔

(PLD 1979 Lah 587)

وہ ملزم جس کے خلاف مقدمہ زیر تجویز ہو ریمانڈ پر صرف پولیس اسٹیشن میں رکھا جا سکتا ہے کسی اور جگہ نہیں ورنہ یہ اقدام غیر قانونی ہوگا۔ریمانڈ کے لئے ضروری ہے کہ ملزم کو مجسٹریٹ کے روبرو حاضر کیا جائے۔ مجسٹریٹ کا خود مقامنظر بندی تک جانا غیر قانونی ہے۔

(PLD 1965 Lah 336)

ملزم کے رشتہ داروں کو دوران ریمانڈملزم کو کھانا یا لباس مہیا کرنے سے بھی منع نہیں کیا جا سکتا۔
Regards '

ریمانڈ اور اس کا طریقہ کار

ریمانڈ سے متعلق تفصیلات جاننے کے لئے ضابطہ فوجداری کی دفعات61، 167 اور344 کا مطالعہ ضروری ہے۔ اس کے ساتھ دفعہ62 اور دفعہ173 کا بھی مطالعہ کرنا چاہئے۔

ریمانڈ کے لفظی معنی واپس بھجوانا ہے۔ فوجداری مقدمات میں ملزم کو پھر حوالات بھیجنا مگر پولیس کے تشدد کی وجہ سے یہ اطلاع بڑی خطر ناک بن چکی ہے۔ جب کوئی شخص گرفتار ہوتا ہے تو پولیس اس کو چوبیس گھنٹے کے اندر مجسٹریٹ کے پاس پیش کرنے کی پابند ہوتی ہے اور مزید عرصے کے لئے زیر حراست رکھنا مطلوب ہو تو پولیس مجسٹریٹ سے تحریری حکم حاصل کرتی ہے اس درخواست کو ریمانڈ کی درخواست کہتے ہیں۔ اگر پولیس24 گھنٹے کے اندر ملزم کو عدالت میں پیش نہیں کرتی اور مزید مناسب حکم حاصل نہیں کرتی تو 24 گھنٹے سے بعد کی حراست غیر قانونی شمار ہوگی۔

(PLD 1960 Pesh 74)

عام طور پر ریمانڈ کی درخواست علاقہ مجسٹریٹ کو دی جاتی ہے تاہم ناگزیر صورت میں ریمانڈ کی درخواست کسی بھی مقامی مجسٹریٹ کو دی جا سکتی ہے۔ مجسٹریٹ جس کے روبرو کسی ملزم کو بغرض ریمانڈ پیش کیا جائے زیادہ سے زیادہ پندرہ دن کا ریمانڈ دے سکتا ہے۔ ہائی کورٹ رولز میں بھی ریمانڈ کے متعلق احکامات اور ہدایات دی گئی ہیں۔ ریمانڈ کی درخواستوں میں قانون یہ ہے کہ مجسٹریٹ کو ملزم کے وکیل یا اسکے رشتہ داروں کو یہ حق دینا چاہئے کہ اگر وہ Remand کے خلاف ملزم کی طرف سے عذرات پیش کرنا چاہتے ہیں تو کر سکتے ہیں۔ ہائی کورٹ کے قواعد میں درج ہے کہ مجسٹریٹ کو لازم ہے کہ وہ ملزم کو وکیل رکھنے کا موقع دے تاکہ وہ وکیل ریمانڈ کے خلاف عذرات پیش کر سکے۔

مجسٹریٹ کے لئے ضروری ہے کہ وہ اس بات کا تعین کرے کہ آیا ملزم کا پولیس کے قبضہ میں دیا جانا ضروری ہے یا نہیں۔اگر مجسٹریٹ محسوس کرے کہ ملزم کو پولیس کی حراست میں مزید رکھنا ضروری نہیں ہے تو وہ ریمانڈ کا حکم صادر کرنے سے انکار کر سکتا ہے۔

(PLD 1979 Lah 587)

وہ ملزم جس کے خلاف مقدمہ زیر تجویز ہو ریمانڈ پر صرف پولیس اسٹیشن میں رکھا جا سکتا ہے کسی اور جگہ نہیں ورنہ یہ اقدام غیر قانونی ہوگا۔ریمانڈ کے لئے ضروری ہے کہ ملزم کو مجسٹریٹ کے روبرو حاضر کیا جائے۔ مجسٹریٹ کا خود مقامنظر بندی تک جانا غیر قانونی ہے۔

(PLD 1965 Lah 336)

ملزم کے رشتہ داروں کو دوران ریمانڈملزم کو کھانا یا لباس مہیا کرنے سے بھی منع نہیں کیا جا سکتا۔

10 Kinds of to which offenders are liable under the provisions of Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

1. Firstly,---------------- Qisas ("retribution");
2. Secondly,----------- Diyat;
3. Thirdly,-------------- Arsh− (Pre-specified Compensation);
4. Fourthly,------------- Daman (Compensation determined by court to be paid by the offender to the victim for causing hurt not liable to Arsh);
5. Fifthly,--------------- Ta'zir (punishment, usually corporal, that can be administered at the discretion of a judge)
6. Sixthly,-------------- Death;
7. Seventhly,---------- Imprisonment for life;
8. Eighthly,------------- Imprisonment which is of two descriptions, namely:--
1. Rigorous (i.e., with hard labour);
2. Simple;
9. Ninthly, Forfeiture of property;
10. Tenthly, Fine].

First five punishments are added by amendments and are considered Islamic Punishments, and very few are sentenced to these punishments so far. Anyone who is sentenced to first five punishments can appeal to Federal Shariat court.
1. Death: Death is the highest form of punishment authorised by Law. It also Known as The Capital Punishment as well as capital Sentence.
Death May be awarded as punishment for the following 9 offences:-
I. Waging War against Pakistan. (Section No:121)
II. Abetting Mutiny actually committed. (Section No: 132)
III. Giving or fabricating false evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death. (Section No: 149)
IV. Murder. (Section No: 302)
V. Abetment of su***de of a minor or insane, or intoxicated person.
(Section No: 305)
VI. Dacoity accompanied with murder. (Section No: 396)
VII. Attempt to murder by a person under sentence of imprisonment for life.
(Section No: 307)
VIII. Murder committed during sentence of imprisonment for life.
(Section No: 303)
IX. Hijacking. (Section No: 403-B)

2. Imprisonment For Life: Imprisonment for Life May be awarded as punishment for the following 45 offences;

I. Waging or attempting to wage war or abetting waging of war against Pakistan. (Section No: 121)
II. Conspiracy to commit offence punishable by section 121. (Section No: 121-A)
III. Collecting arms, etc, with intension of waging war against Pakistan.
(Section No: 122)
IV. Sedition. (Section No: 124-A)
V. Waging war or against any Asiatic power in alliance with Pakistan.
(Section No: 125)
VI. Abetting mutiny or attempting to seduce a soldier, sailor or airman.
(Section No: 131)
VII. Abetment of mutiny if mutiny is committed in consequence whereof.
(Section No: 132)
VIII. Giving or fabricating false evidence with intent to procure conviction of capital offence. (Section No: 194)
IX. Giving or fabricating false evidence with intent to procure conviction of capital offence with imprisonment for life, etc. (Section No: 195)
X. Resistance or obstruction to Lawful apprehension of another person.
(Section No: 225)
XI. Omission to apprehend or sufferance of escape on part of public servant in case not otherwise provided for. (Section No: 225-A)
XII. Counterfeiting Pakistan coin. (Section No: 232)
XIII. Making or selling instruments for counterfeiting coin. (Section No: 233)
XIV. Counterfeit Government Stamp. (Section No: 255)
XV. Punishment for murder. (Section No: 302)
XVI. Punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. (Section No: 304)
XVII. Abetment of su***de a child or insane person. (Section No: 305)
XVIII. Attempt to murder. (Section No: 307)
XIX. Punishment of thug. (Section No: 311)
XX. Causing miscarriage without woman’s consent. (Section No: 313)
XXI. Death caused by act done with intent to miscarriage. (Section No: 314)
XXII. Act done with intent to prevent child being born alive or to cause it to die after birth. (Section No: 315)
XXIII. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means.
(Section No: 326)
XXIV. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to extort property to constrain illegal act.
(Section No: 329)
XXV. Kidnapping or abducting in order to murder. (Section No: 364)
XXVI. Habitual dealing in slaves. (Section No: 371)
XXVII. Extortion by threat of accusation of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life. (Section No: 388)
XXVIII. Putting Person in fear of accusation of offence in order to commit extortion. (Section No: 389)
XXIX. Voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery. (Section No: 394)
# # #. Dacoity with murder. (Section No: 396)
# # . Punishment for belonging to gang of dacoits. (Section No: 400)
# # . Criminal breach of trust by public servant or by bankers, merchant or agent. (Section No: 409)
# # . Dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a Dacoity.
(Section No: 412)
# # . Habitually dealing in stolen property. (Section No: 413)

# # . Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house, etc.
(Section No: 414)
# # . Mischief with intent to destroy or make unsafe a decked vessel or one of twenty tons burden. (Section No: 437)
# # . House trespass in order to commit offence punishable with death.
(Section No: 449)
# # . Grievous hurt caused whilst committing lurking house-trespass or house breaking. (Section No: 459)
# # . All persons jointly concerned in lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night punishable with death or grievous hurt caused by one of them.
(Section No: 460)
XL. Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. (Section No: 467)
XLI. Making or possessing counterfeit seal, etc, with intent to commit forgery punishable under section 467. (Section No: 472)
XLII. Having possession of document described in section 466 or 467 knowing it to be forged and intending to use it as genuine. (Section No: 474)
XLIII. Counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 467 or possessing counterfeit marked material.
(Section No: 475)
XLIV. Fraudulent cancellation, destruction, etc., of will, authority to adopt of valuable security. (Section No: 447)
XLV. Punishment for attempting to commit offence punishable with imprisonment for life or for shorter terms. (Section No: 511
Regards' .