We The People

Sign up for Robinhood with my link and we'll both pick our own gift stock 🎁

Choose from a range of leading companies. Limitations apply. Earn fractional sharesYou get $5-$200 worth of fractional shares from America's leading companies. Limitations apply. See Terms and Conditions.

Was the election really rigged?

TikTok · yoshhook39 101.2K likes, 4743 comments. “ with Durden 🌑”

Dirtbag Swine Burn The Constitution. This BodyCam video was brought to my attention by This Is A Public Service YouTube Channel. Please like, share and subscribe to This Is A Public Service. ht...

I found this on NewsBreak: Nearly 20 cases dismissed after former Siloam Springs officer's credibility comes into question

Nearly 20 cases dismissed after former Siloam Springs officer's credibility comes into question - NewsBreak BENTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, Ark. — Benton County Prosecuting Attorney Joshua Robinson filed motions to dismiss 20 cases involving a former Siloam Springs police officer who resigned...

I found this on NewsBreak: Former Crawford County deputies charged with excessive force has trial pushed back to May 2024

Former Crawford County deputies charged with excessive force has trial pushed back to May 2024 - NewsBreak CRAWFORD COUNTY, ARKANSAS, Ark. — The trial for former Crawford County deputies accused of using excessive force while arresting a man outside a Mulberry gas station...

Arkansas declines to release police officer database, preventing public oversight of problem cops - NewsBreak When new officials took on the oversight of Arkansas law enforcement officers under Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders early this year, they made keeping bad cops off the street a focus. They said they adopted new processes and safeguards intended to prevent problem officers from hopping from department to...

Local Man Killed in Officer-Involved Shooting, State Police Investigating | Arkansas Updates | NewsBreak Original The State Police Criminal Investigation Division is investigating an officer-involved shooting in Saline County. The incident resulted in the death of a 39-year-old man, Jeremy Dale Adams, from Shannon Hills. The event occurred on Thursday, November 16, 2023. Local deputies responded to a call about...

FUN FACT:
A Man Who Is His Own Lawyer Has A Fool for a Client

Meanings of
“A Man Who Is His Own Lawyer Has A Fool for a Client”
This is an English proverb, which means if the person has not studied law and is trying to defend himself is foolish.
This proverb expresses its meaning literally and is easy to interpret.
In other words, it means that a wise person,
if blamed, should have others to defend him, such as lawyers.
It also means that if a person represents himself in the court,
then he ends up having himself trapped as he cannot properly defend himself.

Origin of “A Man Who Is His Own Lawyer Has A Fool for a Client”

Ezoic
This proverb is stated to have appeared in print
in the book of Henry Kett, The Flowers of Wit which was first published in 1814. It states that “I hesitate not to pronounce, that every man who is his own lawyer, has a fool for a client.”

However, Bryan A Garner, a prominent legal writer, states that its earliest use has been tranced to 1809 in Philadelphia as “He who is always his own counsellor will often have a fool for his client.”

It is very interesting to note, he states, that the Alabama Bar Association considered it a rule for its members that they should not represent themselves in the cases they are involved. However, it was later deleted on account of constitutional requirements as Walter P. Armstrong has quoted in A Century of Legal Ethics.

Contrary to popular opinion, Benjamin Franklin was not a lawyer, nor did he utter this famous quote.
During Benjamin Franklin's life, he worked many jobs and held many titles, but he never became a lawyer.

Earn A Paralegal Or Legal Studies Degree From Home

Judge denies plea deal for former Rogers officer accused of animal cruelty - NewsBreak A former Rogers police officer arrested in connection to the death of three dogs has been denied a plea deal and will appear for trial next year.

Lara Logan on X Going down in flames.

Long Island Audit on Twitter “Fellow Patriots, I was recently interviewed on Watch the full segment here: https://t.co/9fXJ75DHrP Let them know LIA sent you! Our work for Transparency & Accountability within our government is being noticed by the mainstream media. We the People have the power.…”

Extortion ??

Arkansas Wants to Unconstitutionally “Card” People Before They Use Social Media - NewsBreak From banning books to restricting classroom discussions about race and gender, politicians across the country have been busy censoring speech in the name of “protecting the...

No excuse for stupidity...
I see a lawsuit coming.
("MY BAD" just don't cut it)

Texas police held a Black family at gunpoint and handcuffed their son after an officer mistyped while running their license plate - NewsBreak The officers typed in the wrong state when running the family's license plate, leading them to falsely believe the car was stolen.

I live this...
I want a t-shirt depicting something like this.

WOW...
In Springdale Arkansas...
The cops seem to think that they have unbridled power to do whatever they want.
(Though, the driver should comply to unlawful orders in order to make change, the officer should show the professionalism, courtesy, and integrity of the standards of our great state and communities without violating the public. When does it stop?)

Officer Tries To Rip Door Off | Traffic Stop | This got UGLY! Hello Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome back to San Joaquin Junior, today’s video is coming to you from, Anna Mayer. Folks, buckle up because I am going to absol...

Why pew-pew a suspect when you can let nature take over.
Dumbest cop stunt ever.

Officer who put woman in police car hit by train didn’t know it was on the tracks, defense says - NewsBreak DENVER (AP) — A Colorado police officer accused of putting a handcuffed woman in a parked police car that was hit by a freight train did not know the car was parked on the tracks, the officer’s lawyer said in court Monday. While evidence will show Officer Jordan...

A Federal Lawsuit maybe?

'Do not release the dog with his hands up!' Black man mauled by police canine after Ohio pursuit - NewsBreak A police dog mauled a Black man in Ohio during a July Fourth traffic stop after he surrendered to authorities with his hands raised in the...

SO, apparently Mississippi is NOT a free state.

"Mississippi is not a free will state"

Packing Heat With No Paperwork: New Revised Arkansas Law Allows Citizens to Carry Concealed Firearm Without Permit | Clarence Walker | NewsBreak Original Packing Heat With No Paperwork: New Arkansas Law Allows Citizens to Carry Concealed Fi****ms Without Permit License. Arkansas citizens can freely carry concealed weapons without a permit license in the state of Arkansas. Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed the bill(SB 777) that was passe...

If you are or know an attorney...
Help where you can.
Lend your expertise and knowledge...
Join the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.
F.I.R.E.

FIRE Legal Network The FIRE Legal Network is a nationwide group of attorneys to whom we refer cases when counsel is necessary and the matter at issue falls outside the scope of FIRE’s mission or ability to assist.

New gun laws taking effect in Arkansas on July 31

New gun laws taking effect in Arkansas on July 31 - NewsBreak ARKANSAS, USA — At the end of the month many of the acts passed during the legislative session will go into effect—including some that will impact...

The 1st Amendment:

The Supreme Court of the United States is considering a petition from a January 6 defendant that has the chance to affect hundreds, if not thousands of cases.

The petition for writ of certiorari, a type of appeal to the Supreme Court to review a lower court case, has been filed by a J6 defendant named Edward Lang. Lang contends that he attended the protest at the Capitol grounds on January 6 and was swept up into a riot, where he was compelled to defend himself from violence. In the course of the rioting, he assaulted a police officer, as he contends, to defend himself from harm.

As the petition states, the SCOTUS’ decision “will influence scores, if not hundreds, of prosecutions arising from the riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.” The legal filing argues that the court should review the case “to rein in prosecutors” who are misapplying federal statutes in a “potentially dangerous manner.”

“Individuals appearing at protests to petition for the redress of grievances may likely now feel chilled to exercise core First Amendment rights,” the writ contends. “If the protest turns violent, will they, too, be swept in events and charged with acting in a corrupt manner?”

Norman Pattis, Lang’s attorney, criticized the government’s handling of the January 6 cases, characterizing their misuse and abuse of the federal penal code as ‘shocking.’

“Without action from this Court, hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans will face substantial prison sentences for doing no more than speaking out at a protest that evolved into a dynamic conflict,” the petitioners argue. “It is no overstatement to say the future of the First Amendment hangs in the balance.”

Prior to his trial, Lang had filed a motion to dismiss the obstruction charge, which carries a 20-year prison sentence. The D.C. District court initially granted the motion, but the decision was overturned by an appeals court. A subsequent motion for a rehearing was denied.

The appeal is based on Fifth Amendment grounds, holding that, “No person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” Lang has been in custody for over 900 days without a trial.

He suggested that his appeal could also impact the Justice Department’s potential obstruction charges against former President Donald Trump. Lang emphasized the timing of his filing, as Trump is currently a leading figure within the Republican Party. While other charges against Trump might be resolved through a plea deal, a conviction on the obstruction of Congress charge could have serious consequences for him.

At the heart of the case is the alleged misapplication of 18 U.S. Code 1512 (c)(2), which regards to the obstruction of official proceedings, particularly with a “corrupt purpose.” Prosecutors have argued that the “corrupt purpose” is rioting, purportedly at the behest of former President Donald Trump, with the aim of the president unlawfully retaining power by halting the Electoral College proceedings.

As the legal writ points out, there has been no plausible explanation given by prosecutors about how rioters temporarily obstructing the Electoral College vote count would lead to Donald Trump retaining his office. (Furthermore, the Electoral College session was originally interrupted by the pipe bomb threats at the RNC and DNC headquarters.)

Lang allegedly fought against police officers in the Capitol for more than two hours, repeatedly striking officers with a bat and brandishing a stolen police shield. His 13-count indictment alleged that he assaulted six Metropolitan Police Officers, caused bodily injury to one of them, and engaged in disorderly conduct and physical violence with a bat and shield in a restricted area of the Capitol.

Lang’s motion to dismiss the obstruction charge under was initially granted by the District Court, but the government appealed the decision and the Appellate Court sided with the government in a split decision. A motion for rehearing was denied, and the mandate was stayed only for the obstruction count. Lang is scheduled to go to trial in the fall on related counts.

The key issue in Lang’s petition is whether the indictment’s reliance on the obstruction of official proceedings charge violates the prohibition against an overly broad application of a statute. It is argued that the government’s use of this statute in the January 6 riot prosecutions represents a significant expansion of its scope, which goes against previous interpretations of the law. This broad interpretation has been criticized as politically motivated and a misuse of the penal code.

The charges against Lang include assaults on certain officers under 18 U.S.C. Section 111(a)(1), as well as misdemeanor charges for entering Capitol Grounds and engaging in disorderly and disruptive conduct. These charges carry lesser penalties compared to the obstruction charge.

In summary, the government’s decision to charge Lang under the obstruction of official proceedings charge is argued as an example of prosecutorial overreach. Concerns are raised about the chilling effect on public demonstration and free speech, as well as the broader implications for democracy in America.

“In the District of Columbia prosecutors are now enabled to prosecute anyone who attends at a public demonstration gone awry; the result will be to create fear in those who would otherwise feel free to petition for redress of grievances, assemble in public places, and speak out about public affairs,” the legal filing states. “It is that regime, and not a few hours’ disturbance at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, that is the more grave threat to democracy in America.”
documentcloud.org/documents/2387…

DocumentCloud

How to get out of a traffic ticket with no lawyer?

$900,000 lawsuit filed !!
Heated deposition !!

Part #1 $900,000 Lawsuit - deposition

Justin Case - YouTube Share your videos with friends, family, and the world

Apparently the laws are different in Mississippi...

"Mississippi is not a free will state"