The Nutrition Facts .Org

A single teaspoon of may double one’s daily production of lignans, phytonutrients that appear to play a role in both prevention and survival. See the video “Breast Cancer Survival & Lignan Intake” at https://bit.ly/3cqtBNQ.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of flaxseeds in breast cancer patients finds flax appears to have the potential to reduce tumor growth in just a matter of weeks. See the video “Flax Seeds & Breast Cancer Survival: Clinical Evidence” at https://bit.ly/2K4UpH9.

Not only have lignans been shown to be helpful against breast cancer, but , too. See the video “Flax Seeds vs. Prostate Cancer” at https://bit.ly/2wUSFXO to learn more.

AS DESCRIBED IN CHAPTER 19 OF WHERE MARY WAS GIVING BERTH TO JESUS & WAS RECOMMENDED TO EAT DATES
👉DO REALLY HELP WITH LABOUR & DELIVERY ? RESEARCHERS DECIDED TO PUT IT TO THE TEST.
-------------------------------++++++-----------------------------
Researchers finally decided to put it to the test. They had some “anecdotal evidence” that dates might be helping, but they wanted to know for sure “whether the addition of date fruit for the last few weeks of pregnancy would reduce the need for labor induction or augmentation”—that’s where you give drugs to induce uterine contractions, to initiate or accelerate labor. It’s “one of the most commonly-performed obstetrical procedures” in the U.S., dramatically increasing over the last few decades—from less than 10% of deliveries to now nearly a quarter. There are certainly legitimate medical indications, but are often done just for “convenience,” and not necessarily the convenience of the patient, but the provider may also have perverse “financial incentives” and other reasons to want to speed things along. Dates might not help with those factors, but might they help foster a normal spontaneous delivery? Let’s find out.

A prospective study: women eating six dates a day—that’s totally doable—during their last month of pregnancy versus no dates at all, and…”the women who consumed date fruit had significantly [better] cervical dilation,…significantly higher proportion of intact membranes.” That’s a good thing. And: “Spontaneous labor occurred in 96% of those who consumed dates, compared with 79% women in the non-date” group, with significantly less drugs used, and the “labour was shorter,” as in about seven hours shorter overall. “It is [therefore] concluded that the consumption of date fruit in the last 4 weeks [of pregnancy] significantly reduced the need for induction and augmentation of labour…

https://fb.watch/dzWe7YXqfw/

REASON FOR CAN BE BOVINE LEUKAEMIA VIRUS FOUND IN MEAT & COW MILK ✍️....Dr. McGreger
---------------------------------+++-----------------------------------

In 2015, researchers in California found bovine leukemia virus (BLV) stitched into the DNA of human breast cancer tumors from mastectomies at such higher rates than was found in normal breast tissue taken from breast reduction surgery that they calculated that as many as 37 percent of breast cancer cases may be attributable to bovine leukemia virus exposure, likely through the consumption of milk or meat obtained from infected animals.

In response, the milk and meat industries seemed more concerned about consumer confidence than consumer cancer. But scientifically, the research priority turned to: could the California results be replicated? The answer, it turns out, was yes. They were replicated among women in Iran. Replicated in Brazil. In Australia, the link was even stronger. In Texas, the same thing. Women diagnosed with breast cancer were found to be so much more likely to have bovine leukemia virus DNA in their breast tissue, compared with women without cancer, that the attributable risk was calculated at 51.82 percent––indicating that this meat and dairy virus could be responsible for at least one-half of the breast cancer cases among the women in Texas they studied.

All in all, six of the eight studies performed to date found the virus in human breast tissues, which suggests strongly that BLV does infect humans, and breasts can be targets of infection. Four of the five studies that were able to compare infection rates in cancerous tissue versus normal breast tissue found the odds of finding the virus in the tumors was, on average, four times higher.

How does that compare to other breast cancer risk factors? If you go on hormone replacement for five years, you can bump up your breast cancer risk 30 percent. If you take the pill for more than a dozen years, your risk may go up 40 percent. If you’re obese when you’re older, your risk can go up 60 percent. Having a first-degree relative with breast cancer may double your risk. But having your breast infected with bovine leukemia virus may quadruple your risk. The only risk factors more potent than BLV infection were having the BRCA gene mutations like Angelina Jolie has, or a high dose of ionizing radiation, like being in the wrong place at decidedly the wrong time.

Beyond confirmation, one study suggested that older patients had a greater likelihood of testing positive for bovine leukemia virus. That makes sense, if BLV is from exposure to dairy and meat. The older we get, the more meals we’ve had, and the more opportunities to become infected over time.

Researchers also discovered that the virus comes first, present in some breast tissues 3 to 10 years before cancer was diagnosed. “This argues against the idea of viral invasion of already malignant cells,” quashing the theory that maybe the virus is somehow just attracted to the cancer after the fact. Could this explain the consistent findings that breast cancer tissue is more likely to harbor infection? Again, the data showed no; the virus appeared to come first. This review doesn’t provide absolute proof that BLV is a cause of breast cancer, but based on the best available balance of evidence, BLV infection does indeed appear to be a breast cancer risk factor.

The latest revelation is that it’s now been found in human blood, too. This has a number of potential ramifications. Blood banks, for example, don’t screen for it. So, it’s possible you can get it from consuming meat or dairy, or getting blood from someone who consumed meat or dairy.

This could also mean that BLV could cause leukemia in people, too. It does in chimpanzees. Two infant chimps were fed milk from cows naturally infected with the BLV, and they both died of leukemia. We didn’t even know chimps could get leukemia.

This certainly suggests the possibility of transmission or induction of leukemia through the ingestion of milk from BLV-infected cows; or blood-borne spread could carry the virus to other organs. In cattle, the virus causes blood cancers, but this may be just because dairy cattle are turned into hamburger when they are still so young, so maybe they don’t have time for tumors to grow in other organs.

How concerned should we be about bovine leukemia virus? It is not clear yet whether this is a good news story or a bad news story. If subsequent studies show that BLV does cause breast cancer in humans, this will have significant repercussions for the dairy and cattle industries. But that means there is something we can do about it. Perhaps attempts should be made to eradicate the infection from cattle now, rather than wait for the final word. Twenty-one nations have eradicated BLV from their dairy cattle. In contrast, in the U.S. the BLV prevalence just keeps going up. If the industries are not going to step up and try to eliminate the disease, then the least they could do is eliminate some of the practices that spread the disease between animals.

BLV is spread via blood through contaminated needles, saw or gouge dehorners, tattoo pliers, ear taggers, hoof knives, nose tongs, and other tools of the agribusiness trade. Though in view of the emerging information about BLV in human breast cancer, it may be prudent to encourage the complete elimination of BLV in cattle, particularly in the dairy industry. The hope is that either way it may help reduce the scourge of breast cancer.

eating one or more days a week had significantly higher rates of , and the more frequently meat was eaten, the more frequent the disease. Even at the same weight, those eating -based had but a fraction of the diabetes rates.

By 2015, the clinical practice guidelines from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Endocrinology explicitly endorsed a plant-based diet as their general recommendation for patients with diabetes. The American Diabetes Association is also now on board, listing it as one of the dietary patterns acceptable for the management of the condition. The Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA), however, has really taken the lead, not only accepting but recommending plant-based diets for disease management.

What’s more, the CDA has called on diabetes education centers in Canada to develop resources and provide counseling to address barriers people may have towards eating a plant-based diet, such as ignorance, the largest obstacle identified.

Indeed, nearly nine out of ten patients interviewed had never heard of using a plant-based diet to treat diabetes. Most of the staff were aware, but only about one in three were currently recommending a plant-based diet. One reason staff gave for not even mentioning it was they didn’t think their patients would actually do it, but survey results indicate that nearly two-thirds of the patients would be willing to give plant-based eating a try.

The PCRM Geico studies found that strictly plant-based diets were “well accepted with over 95 percent adherence rate,” presumably because people just felt so much better, experiencing increased energy, better digestion, better sleep, and satisfaction.

A second reason staff gave for not recommending plant-based diets was being unclear about the supporting scientific evidence. In fact, a plant-based diet beat out the conventional American Diabetes Association diet in a head-to-head randomized controlled clinical trial without restricting portions–no calorie- or carb-counting at all.

A review of all such studies found that people following plant-based diets have improved reductions in blood sugars, body weight, and cardiovascular risk factors, compared to people who include animal products in their diet.

Diabetes educators may just be behind the times. There is a lag from new scientific findings appearing in the literature, getting to the clinician, and finally being shared with the patient. That’s one of the reasons Dr. Greger started https://bit.ly/3ekYbIJ—to speed up the process!

Watch the following videos to learn more:
"Plant-Based Diets and Diabetes" at https://bit.ly/3pG4tLn
"Plant-Based Diets Recognized by Diabetes Associations" at http://bit.ly/2yppChm
"Plant-Based Diets for Diabetes" at http://bit.ly/2MfOguo

Antioxidant intake from foods (not supplements) is associated with lower cancer risk. Watch the video "Food Antioxidants & Cancer"

Will I get enough protein on a plant-based diet?
------------------------------+++++++-----------------------------

A diverse whole food plant based diet of grains, vegetables and beans can definitely meet your daily protein needs. An average woman needs about 46 grams of protein daily; the average man about 56 grams. Research shows that most of the people who are on a strict plant-based diet fulfil their daily protein requirement fairly easily.
Learn more

https://thenutritionfacts.org/index.php/2022/03/25/plant-based-diet/

RECLAIM YOUR HEALTH & RECLAIM YOUR LIFE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Some of the best researchers in the world have pondered over the problem of Lifestyle diseases taking the form of epidemic in the most developed countries across the world.
The fact that there are more people dying of Heart diseases, cancer & Type-2 diabetes in the affluent countries than the countries where majority of the population is poor so can't afford a so called nutritious meal.
You are suffering from some of the below mentioned diseases then you are most likely be living in a developed society.

Diabetes, Heart disease & atherosclerosis, Osteoporosis, Liver disease, Obesity, Arthritis & autoimmune diseases, GI (bowel) diseases, High blood pressure, High cholesterol, Cancer, Kidney disease, Multiple sclerosis, Depression.

However the good thing is that the cure to all of these diseases is pretty simple. READ MORE

https://thenutritionfacts.org/index.php/nutrition-facts-blog/

The Nutrition Facts .Org updated their business hours.

The Nutrition Facts .Org updated their website address.

The Nutrition Facts .Org is now on WhatsApp.