Videos by OEM Providers, Product Quality Assurance, EMS Worldwide, Finished Goods.
* Barr, P. (1998). Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change. Organization Science, 9, 644–669.��
* Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500.��
* Benedettini, O., Neely, A., & Swink, M. (2015). Why do servitized firms fail? A risk-based explanation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(6), 946–979.��
* Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books.��
* Brummans, B., Putnam, L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communication Monographs, 75(1), 25–51.��
* Burton-Jones, A., & Straub, D. W. (2006). Re-conceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical tests. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 228–246.��
* Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U., & Narasayya, V. (2011). An overview of business intelligence technology. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 88.��
* Choo, W. C. (2002). Sensemaking, knowledge creation, and decision making: Organizational knowing as emergent strategy. In C. W. Choo & N. Bontis (Eds.), Strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge (pp. 79–89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.��
* Davern, M., Shaft, M., & Te’eni, D. (2012). Cognition matters: Enduring questions in cognitive IS research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 273–314.��
* Davidson, A. (2002). Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 329–358.��
* Davidson, E. (2006). A technological frames perspective on information technology and organizational change. The Journal of Appli
Elon Musk: Internal and external alignment in the servitization journey - Overcoming the challenges.
* Barr, P. (1998). Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change. Organization Science, 9, 644–669.��
* Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500.��
* Benedettini, O., Neely, A., & Swink, M. (2015). Why do servitized firms fail? A risk-based explanation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(6), 946–979.��
* Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books.��
* Brummans, B., Putnam, L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communication Monographs, 75(1), 25–51.��
* Burton-Jones, A., & Straub, D. W. (2006). Re-conceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical tests. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 228–246.��
* Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U., & Narasayya, V. (2011). An overview of business intelligence technology. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 88.��
* Choo, W. C. (2002). Sensemaking, knowledge creation, and decision making: Organizational knowing as emergent strategy. In C. W. Choo & N. Bontis (Eds.), Strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge (pp. 79–89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.��
* Davern, M., Shaft, M., & Te’eni, D. (2012). Cognition matters: Enduring questions in cognitive IS research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 273–314.��
* Davidson, A. (2002). Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 329–358.��
* Davidson, E. (2006). A technological frames perspective on information technology and organizational change. The Journal of Appli
Feedback and Engagement: Integrating Market and State with People and Community, #Wisdom #Motivation.
Smart Cities / Regions / For Development / Community Building / Learning / Network Mobilization / Innovation / Market Integration
1. Austin, Texas #Austin Collaboration
2. Los Angeles, California #LosAngeles Insight
3. San Diego, California #SanDiego Team Basics
4. Denver, Colorado #Denver Value Propositions
5. Houston, Texas #Houston Software Design
6. Chicago, Illinois #Chicago Community Building
7. New York, New York #NewYork SuperRadiance
8. London, United Kingdom #London Joy
9. Bangkok, Thailand #Bangkok Honor
10. Seoul Korea #Seoul Good Faith
11. Italy / Brasil / Hong Kong #HongKong Integrity
12. Berlin, Germany #Berlin Mindfulness
13. Stockholm, Sweden #Stockholm ComplexSystems
14. Detroit, Michigan #Detroit Multi Objective Optimization
15. Miami, Florida #Miami Family Science
16. Tampa, Florida #Tampa Quantum Chemistry
17. Charlotte, NC #Charlotte Decision Support
18. Richmond, Virginia #Richmond Sustainability
19. Boston, Massachusetts #Boston Learning and Improvement
20. Phoenix, AZ #Phoenix Intelligent Systems
21. Seattle, WA #Seattle Smart City as a Service
22. Portland, OR #Portland Rational Unified Process
23. Vancouver, BC #Vancouver Quantum Optimization
24. Toronto, Ontario #Toronto Health
25. Madrid, Spain #Madrid Quality
26. Mumbai, India #Mumbai Apple Development
27. Kansas City, MO #KansasCity Microsoft Development
28. St. Petersberg, FL #StPetersberg Edge Computing
29. Nashville, Tennesse #Nashville SaaS
30. Netherlands, Israel, Australia #Collaboration
31. Atlanta, Georgia, #Atlanta Oracle
32. Tokyo, Japan #Tokyo Tesla Elon Musk
33. Paris, France #Paris Embedded Systems
34. Cape Town, South Africa #CapeTown Spiritual and Economic Linkages
35. Dubai, UAE #Dubai Cognitive Computing
36. Minneapolis, MN #Minneapolis Rural and Urban Linkages
Feedback and Engagement:
Integrating Market and State with People and Community, #Wisdom #Motivation.
Chu, J.-H., Feng, K.-T., & Chang, T.-S. (2014). Energy-efficient cell s
Jordan Etem: Christmas Learning.
Smart Cities / Regions / For Development / Community Building / Learning / Network Mobilization / Innovation / Market Integration
1. Austin, Texas #Austin
2. Los Angeles, California #LosAngeles
3. San Diego, California #SanDiego
4. Denver, Colorado #Denver
5. Houston, Texas #Houston
6. Chicago, Illinois #Chicago
7. New York, New York #NewYork
8. London, United Kingdom #London
9. Bangkok, Thailand #Bangkok
10. Seoul Korea #Seoul
11. Italy / Brasil / Hong Kong #HongKong
12. Berlin, Germany #Berlin
13. Stockholm, Sweden #Stockholm
14. Detroit, Michigan #Detroit
15. Miami, Florida #Miami
16. Tampa, Florida #Tampa
17. Charlotte, NC #Charlotte
18. Richmond, Virginia #Richmond
19. Boston, Massachusetts #Boston
20. Phoenix, AZ #Phoenix
21. Seattle, WA #Seattle
22. Portland, OR #Portland
23. Vancouver, BC #Vancouver
24. Toronto, Ontario #Toronto
25. Madrid, Spain #Madrid
26. Mumbai, India #Mumbai
27. Kansas City, MO #KansasCity
28. St. Petersberg, FL #StPetersberg
29. Nashville, Tennesse #Nashville
30. Netherlands, Israel, Australia #Collaboration
31. Atlanta, Georgia, #Atlanta
32. Tokyo, Japan #Tokyo
33. Paris, France #Paris
34. Cape Town, South Africa #CapeTown
35. Dubai, UAE #Dubai
36. Minneapolis, MN #Minneapolis
Integrating Market and State with People and Community, with Wisdom and Motivation.
Chu, J.-H., Feng, K.-T., & Chang, T.-S. (2014). Energy-efficient cell selection and resource allocation in LTE-A heterogeneous networks. In 2014 IEEE 25th annual international symposium on personal, indoor, and mobile radio communication (PIMRC), 2014: IEEE, pp. 976–980.��#Sustainability
�Guvenc, I. (2011). Capacity and fairness analysis of heterogeneous networks with range expansion and interference coordination. IEEE Communications Letters, 15(10), 1084–1087.��#Communications
* Okino, K., Nakayama, T., Yamazaki, C., Sato, H., & Kusano, Y. (2011). Pico cell range expansion with interference mitigation toward LTE-Advanced heterog
Sheryl Sandberg and Guy Kawasaki: Creating Radiance for People and Community. Holistic Progress with the market.
Sheryl Sandberg and Guy Kawasaki: Creating Radiance for People and Community. Holistic Progress with the market.
* Sirower ML (1997) Synergy trap: how companies lose the acquisition game. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY��#Ethics
* Slusky AR, Caves RE (1991) Synergy, agency and the determinants of premia paid in mergers. J Ind Econ 39(3):277–296�#DataScience�
* Sparks D (1998) Creating and leading strategic combinations. Delta Consulting Group, New York, NY�#DataEngineering�
* Stahl GK, Voight A (2008) Do cultural differences matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model for examination. Organ Sci 19:160–176��#DataMining
* Stahl GK, Angwin DN, Very P, Gomes E, Weber Y, Tarba SY, Noorderhaven N, Benyamini H, Bouckenooghe D, Chreim S, Durand M, Hassett ME, Kokk G, Mendenhall ME, Mirc N, Miska C, Park KM, Reynolds N-S, Rouzies A, Sarala RM, Seloti SL, Søndergaard M, Yildiz HE (2013) Sociocultural integration in mergers and acquisitions: unresolved paradoxes and directions for future research. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 55(4):333–356��#Oracle #AI #ValueCreation
* Steiner PO (1975) Mergers: motives, effect, policies. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI�#Microsoft�
* Strikwerda J, Stoelhorst JW (2009) The emergence and evolution of the multidimensional organization. Calif Manag Rev 51(4):11–31��#Intel
* Sudarsanam S, Holl P, Salami A (1996) Shareholder wealth gains in mergers: effect of synergy and ownership. J Bus Financ Account 23(5–6):673–698��#AMD
* Takeishi A (2001) Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strateg Manag J 22(5):403–433��#Tesla
* Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533�#Dell�
* Thanos IC, Papadakis VM (2012) The use of accounting-based measures in measuring M&A performance: a review of five decades of research. In: Cooper CL, Finkelstein S (ed
Jordan Etem: How do codes of ethics affect management behavior? The Impact of familiar ethics.
Jordan Etem: How do codes of ethics affect management behavior? The Impact of familiar ethics.
* Sirower ML (1997) Synergy trap: how companies lose the acquisition game. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY��#Ethics
* Slusky AR, Caves RE (1991) Synergy, agency and the determinants of premia paid in mergers. J Ind Econ 39(3):277–296�#DataScience�
* Sparks D (1998) Creating and leading strategic combinations. Delta Consulting Group, New York, NY�#DataEngineering�
* Stahl GK, Voight A (2008) Do cultural differences matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model for examination. Organ Sci 19:160–176��#DataMining
* Stahl GK, Angwin DN, Very P, Gomes E, Weber Y, Tarba SY, Noorderhaven N, Benyamini H, Bouckenooghe D, Chreim S, Durand M, Hassett ME, Kokk G, Mendenhall ME, Mirc N, Miska C, Park KM, Reynolds N-S, Rouzies A, Sarala RM, Seloti SL, Søndergaard M, Yildiz HE (2013) Sociocultural integration in mergers and acquisitions: unresolved paradoxes and directions for future research. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 55(4):333–356��#Oracle #AI #ValueCreation
* Steiner PO (1975) Mergers: motives, effect, policies. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI�#Microsoft�
* Strikwerda J, Stoelhorst JW (2009) The emergence and evolution of the multidimensional organization. Calif Manag Rev 51(4):11–31��#Intel
* Sudarsanam S, Holl P, Salami A (1996) Shareholder wealth gains in mergers: effect of synergy and ownership. J Bus Financ Account 23(5–6):673–698��#AMD
* Takeishi A (2001) Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strateg Manag J 22(5):403–433��#Tesla
* Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533�#Dell�
* Thanos IC, Papadakis VM (2012) The use of accounting-based measures in measuring M&A performance: a review of five decades of research. In: Cooper CL, Finkelstein S (eds) Advances in m
Jordan Etem: Organizing Cybersecurity in Action: A Pragmatic, Ethical Reasoning Approach.
Jordan Etem: Organizing Cybersecurity in Action: A Pragmatic, Ethical Reasoning Approach.
#Organization #Oracle #Tesla #Microsoft
#TeamBasics #Meta #People #Community
#Integration #Ethics #CyberSecurity #Dell #Intel
* Adams, J.S., Tashchian, A., Shore, T.H.: Codes of ethics as signals for ethical behavior. J. Bus. Ethics 29(3), 199–211 (2001)�#DeepLearning�
* Anderson, J.C., Rungtusanatham, M., Schroeder, R.G.: A theory of quality management underlying the deming management method. Acad. Manag. Rev. 19(3), 472–509 (1994)�#ReinforcementLearning�
* Argyris, C., Schön, D.: Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1978)�#Reasoning�
* Baskerville, R.: Information warfare: a comparative framework for business information security. J. Inf. Syst. Secur. 1(1), 23–50 (2005)�#Optimization�
* Baskerville, R., Rowe, F., Wolff, F.C.: Integration of information systems and cybersecurity countermeasures. ACM SIGMIS Database: DATABASE for Adv. Inf. Syst. 49(1), 33–52 (2018)�#Economics�
* Baskerville, R., Spagnoletti, P., Kim, J.: Incident-centered information security: managing a strategic balance between prevention and response. Inf. Manag. 51(1), 138–151 (2014)��#CloudComputing
* de Bruijn, H., Janssen, M.: Building cybersecurity awareness: the need for evidence-based framing strategies. Gov. Inf. Q. 34(1), 1–7 (2017)��#FinTech
* Canard, F.: “W. E . DEMING, pragmatism and sustainability. In: 17th Annual International Deming Research Seminar, pp. 1–17. HAL Archives-Ouvertes, New York (2011)��#Action
* D’Arcy, J., Hovav, A.: Does one size fit all? Examining the differential effects of IS security countermeasures. J. Bus. Ethics 89(SUPPL. 1), 59–71 (2009)�
* Deming, W.E.: The New Economics, p. 235. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)�#Planning�
* Depaoli, P., Sorrentino, M., De Marco, M.: Social and ethical shifts in the digital age: digital technologies for governing or digital technolog
Holistic Light. Big Data, Big Wisdom. #Insight #People #Community #MachineLearning
Holistic Light. Big Data, Big Wisdom.
#Insight #People #Community #MachineLearning
* Stern, J. M., Shiely, J. S., & Ross, I. (2001). The EVA challenge: Implementing value-added change in an organization. New York: John Wiley & Sons.�#Oracle #LarryEllison�
* Striteska, M., & Spickova, M. (2012). Review and comparison of performance measurement systems. The Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 2012, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5171/2012.114900�#Tesla #ElonMusk�
* Susilawati, A., Tan, J., Bell, D., & Sarwar, M. (2013). Develop a framework of performance measurement and improvement system for lean manufacturing activity. International Journal of Lean Thinking, 4(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2017-0098�#Microsoft�
* Tennant, C., & Roberts, P. A. (2000). Hoshin kanri: A technique for strategic quality management. Quality Assurance, 8(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/105294100317173862��#Meta
* Tillema, S., & van der Steen, M. (2015). Co-existing concepts of management control. Management Accounting Research, 27, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.01.002��#Intel
* Toft, J. S., & Lueg, R. (2015). Does EVA beat earnings? A literature review of the evidence since Biddle et al. (1997). Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(3), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00010-X��#AMD
* Vamsi Krishna Jasti, N., & Kodali, R. (2014). A literature review of empirical research methodology in lean manufacturing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(8), 1080–1122. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2012-0169��#EmbeddedSystems #Apple
* Venanzi, D. (2012). Financial performance measures and value creation: The state of the art. Milan: Springer.��#JPMorgan
* Verweire, K., & Van den Berghe, L. (2004). Performance goals and the strategy formation process. In K. Verweire & L. Van den Berghe (Eds.), Integrated performance management: A guide to strategy implementation (pp. 93–115). Lo
Elon Musk: Enabling Value Stream Mapping for Internal Logistics Using Multi Dimensional Process Mining. #Stakeholders
Elon Musk: Enabling Value Stream Mapping for Internal Logistics Using Multi Dimensional Process Mining. #Stakeholders
Schroder, P., Green, B., Grum, N., Fleming, P.: On-line evolution of robust control systems: an industrial active magnetic bearing application. Control Engineering Practice 9(1), 37–49 (2001)
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.J.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4
Alkan, B., Vera, D.A., Ahmad, A., Ahmad, B., Harrison, R.: Complexity in manufacturing systems and its measures: a literature review. EJIE 12, 116–150 (2018)
Fox, F., Aggarwal, V.R., Whelton, H., Johnson, O.: A data quality framework for process mining of electronic health record data. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, NJ, pp. 12–21. IEEE (2018)
Schuh, G., Reuter, C., Prote, J.-P., Brambring, F., Ays, J.: Increasing data integrity for improving decision making in production planning and control. CIRP Ann. 66, 425–428 (2017)
Schuh, G., Thomas, C., Hauptvogel, A., Brambring, F.: Achieving higher scheduling accuracy in production control by implementing integrity rules for production feedback data. Procedia CIRP 19, 142–147 (2014)
* Stern, J. M., Shiely, J. S., & Ross, I. (2001). The EVA challenge: Implementing value-added change in an organization. New York: John Wiley & Sons.�#Oracle�
* Striteska, M., & Spickova, M. (2012). Review and comparison of performance measurement systems. The Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 2012, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5171/2012.114900�#Tesla�
* Susilawati, A., Tan, J., Bell, D., & Sarwar, M. (2013). Develop a framework of performance measurement and improvement system for lean manufacturing activity. International Journal of Lean Thinking, 4(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2017-0098�#Microsoft�
* Tennant, C., & Roberts, P. A. (2000). Hoshin kanri: A technique for strategic qual
Team Basics: Improving as a whole with evolved innovation. #DeepLearning #Engineering #Breakthroughs
Team Basics: Improving as a whole with evolved innovation. #DeepLearning #Engineering #Breakthroughs
* 1.�Ben-Ari M (2008) Mathematical logic for computer science, 2nd edn. Springer International, London. ISBN-978-81-8128-344-3�#Logic�
* 2.�Chowdhary KR (2012) Fundamentals of discrete mathematical structures, 2nd edn. EEE PHI India. ISBN: 978-81-203-4506-5�#Structure�
* 3.�Cohen PJ (2008) Set theory and the continuum hypothesis. Dover, New York�#SetTheory�
* 4.�Davis M, Putnam H (1960) A computing procedure for quantification theory. J ACM 7(3):201–215. https://doi.org/10.1145/321033.321034�#QuantificationTheory�
* 5.�Gelder AV (1991) The well-founded semantics for general logic programs. J ACM 38(3):620–650�#Semantics�
* 6.�Hilbert D (2005) The foundations of geometry. Ebook # 17384�#Reasoning #GeometricComplexity�
* 7.�Kaushik S (2002) Logic and prolog programming. New Age International, New Delhi�#EmbeddedSystems�
* 8.�Puppes P (1972) Axiomatic set theory. Dover, New York�#DataAnalytics�
* 9.�Shankar N (2009) Automated deduction for verification. ACM Comput Surv 41(4):20:1. �#Transactions
* 1.�Bborrajo D et al (2015) Progress in case-based planning. ACM Comput Surv 47(35):1–35�#Planning #Guidance #CaseBased�
* 2.�Bonet B, Geffner H (2001) Planning as heuristic search. Artifi Intell 129:5–33�#Family�
* 3.�Dean T (1996) Automated planning. ACM Comput Surv 28(1):85–88�#Vacations #Meetings #Conferences #Development �
* 4.�Fikes RE, Nilsson NJ (1971) STRIPS: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artifi Intell 2:189–208�#Innovation #WellsFargo�
* 5.�Jonsson P et al (2000) Towards efficient universal planning: a randomized approach. Artifi Intell 117:1–29��#ProblemSolving #Oracle
* 6.�Kaelbling LP et al (1998) Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artifi Intell 101:99–134�#Operations�
* 7.�Kambhamp
Oracle and Tesla: Securing internet of things from the ground up. �Diffusion of Innovation, Big Value for Economy and Community. Smart City as a Service. #DeepLearning
Oracle and Tesla:
Securing internet of things from the ground up.
�Diffusion of Innovation, Big Value for Economy and Community.
Smart City as a Service. #DeepLearning
#USA #SmartCities #Developers #Businesses #Innovation
#CloudComputing #Technology #Infrastructure #SaaS #Chemistry #Catalyst #WinningDynamics
#RayDalio #ElonMusk #LarryEllison #Tesla #Oracle #Databases #Feedback #ComputerVision
Improving Services,
Holistic Decision Making,
Breakthrough progress,
Sensible Planning,
Real Innovation.
Integrating Market and State with People and Community, with Wisdom and Motivation.
Chu, J.-H., Feng, K.-T., & Chang, T.-S. (2014). Energy-efficient cell selection and resource allocation in LTE-A heterogeneous networks. In 2014 IEEE 25th annual international symposium on personal, indoor, and mobile radio communication (PIMRC), 2014: IEEE, pp. 976–980.��#Sustainability
�Guvenc, I. (2011). Capacity and fairness analysis of heterogeneous networks with range expansion and interference coordination. IEEE Communications Letters, 15(10), 1084–1087.��#Communications
* Okino, K., Nakayama, T., Yamazaki, C., Sato, H., & Kusano, Y. (2011). Pico cell range expansion with interference mitigation toward LTE-Advanced heterogeneous networks. In 2011 IEEE international conference on communications workshops (ICC), 2011: IEEE, pp. 1–5.��
* Tefft, J. R., & Kirsch, N. J. (2013). A proximity-based Q-learning reward function for femtocell networks. In 2013 IEEE 78th vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall), 2013: IEEE, pp. 1–5.�#Innovation�
* Saad, H., Mohamed, A., & ElBatt, T. (2012). Distributed cooperative Q-learning for power allocation in cognitive femtocell networks. In 2012 IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall), 2012: IEEE, pp. 1–5.�#Cooperation #Infrastructure�
* Wen, B., Gao, Z., Huang, L., Tang, Y., & Cai, H. (2014). A Q-learning-based downlink resource scheduling method for capacity optimization in LTE femtocells. In 2014 9th
Team Basics: Edge, Security, Cloud, Data. Holistic Development with Community.
Team Basics: Edge, Security, Cloud, Data. Holistic Development with Community.
Chandra, Y. (2017). Social entrepreneurship as emancipatory work. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 657–673.
Connecting People, Building Relationships:
Elon Musk, Tesla
Julie Sweet, Accenture
Ray Dalio #Principles
Lisa Su, AMD
Marissa Mayer #Catalyst
Safra Catz, Oracle
�Connecting Communities, Strengthening Collaboration:
#USA #Israel #Italy #Europe #SmartCities #Developers #Businesses
Improving Services,
Holistic Decision Making,
Breakthrough progress,
Sensible Planning,
Real Innovation.
Integrating Market and State with People and Community, with Wisdom and Motivation.
Chu, J.-H., Feng, K.-T., & Chang, T.-S. (2014). Energy-efficient cell selection and resource allocation in LTE-A heterogeneous networks. In 2014 IEEE 25th annual international symposium on personal, indoor, and mobile radio communication (PIMRC), 2014: IEEE, pp. 976–980.��#Sustainability
�Guvenc, I. (2011). Capacity and fairness analysis of heterogeneous networks with range expansion and interference coordination. IEEE Communications Letters, 15(10), 1084–1087.��#Communications
* Okino, K., Nakayama, T., Yamazaki, C., Sato, H., & Kusano, Y. (2011). Pico cell range expansion with interference mitigation toward LTE-Advanced heterogeneous networks. In 2011 IEEE international conference on communications workshops (ICC), 2011: IEEE, pp. 1–5.��
* Tefft, J. R., & Kirsch, N. J. (2013). A proximity-based Q-learning reward function for femtocell networks. In 2013 IEEE 78th vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall), 2013: IEEE, pp. 1–5.�#Innovation�
* Saad, H., Mohamed, A., & ElBatt, T. (2012). Distributed cooperative Q-learning for power allocation in cognitive femtocell networks. In 2012 IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall), 2012: IEEE, pp. 1–5.�#Cooperation #Infrastructure�
* Wen, B., Gao, Z., Huang, L., Tang, Y., & Cai, H. (2014). A Q-learning-based downlink reso
Clay Magouyrk and Safra Catz: Building spiritual and economic linkages between Stockholm and Milan. #Community
Clay Magouyrk and Safra Catz: Building spiritual and economic linkages between Stockholm and Milan. #Community
�Chu, J.-H., Feng, K.-T., & Chang, T.-S. (2014). Energy-efficient cell selection and resource allocation in LTE-A heterogeneous networks. In 2014 IEEE 25th annual international symposium on personal, indoor, and mobile radio communication (PIMRC), 2014: IEEE, pp. 976–980.��#Sustainability
�Guvenc, I. (2011). Capacity and fairness analysis of heterogeneous networks with range expansion and interference coordination. IEEE Communications Letters, 15(10), 1084–1087.��#Communications
* Okino, K., Nakayama, T., Yamazaki, C., Sato, H., & Kusano, Y. (2011). Pico cell range expansion with interference mitigation toward LTE-Advanced heterogeneous networks. In 2011 IEEE international conference on communications workshops (ICC), 2011: IEEE, pp. 1–5.��
* Tefft, J. R., & Kirsch, N. J. (2013). A proximity-based Q-learning reward function for femtocell networks. In 2013 IEEE 78th vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall), 2013: IEEE, pp. 1–5.�#Innovation�
* Saad, H., Mohamed, A., & ElBatt, T. (2012). Distributed cooperative Q-learning for power allocation in cognitive femtocell networks. In 2012 IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall), 2012: IEEE, pp. 1–5.�#Cooperation #Infrastructure�
* Wen, B., Gao, Z., Huang, L., Tang, Y., & Cai, H. (2014). A Q-learning-based downlink resource scheduling method for capacity optimization in LTE femtocells. In 2014 9th international conference on computer science & education, 2014: IEEE, pp. 625–628.�#Resources #IT #Capacity�
* Galindo-Serrano, A., & Giupponi, L. (2010). Distributed Q-learning for interference control in OFDMA-based femtocell networks. In 2010 IEEE 71st vehicular technology conference, 2010: IEEE, pp. 1–5.�#Technology�
* Guo, D., Tang, L., Zhang, X., & Liang, Y.-C. (2020). Joint optimization of handover control and power allocation based on multi-agent deep reinforc
Julie Sweet and Safra Catz: Building spiritual and economic linkages between India, Israel, and the United States. #Values #Reasoning #Connection
Julie Sweet and Safra Catz: Building spiritual and economic linkages between
India, Israel, and the United States.
#Values #Reasoning #Connection
* 1.�Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: Mapreduce: simplifified data processing on large clusters. Commun. ACM 51(1), 107–113 (2008)�#Data�
* 2.�Isard, M., Budiu, M., Yu, Y., Birrell, A., Fetterly, D.: Dryad: distributed data-parallel programs from sequential building blocks. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 41(3), 59–72 (2007) #Programming�
* 3.�Saha, B., Shah, H., Seth, S., Vijayaraghavan, G., Murthy, A., Curino, C.: Apache tez: a unifying framework for modeling and building data processing applications. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 1357–1369. ACM (2015)�#CloudComputing #DataAnalytics #Oracle�
* 4.�Zaharia, M., Chowdhury, M., Franklin, M.J., Shenker, S., Stoica, I.: Spark: cluster computing with working sets. In: Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, vol. 10, p. 10 (2010)�#AbundantNumbers #Solutions #PayToSource #PayPal #WellsFargo #JPMorgan #Oracle #Tesla �
* 5.�Shvachko, K., Kuang, H., Radia, S., Chansler, R.: The hadoop distributed fifile system. In: 2010 IEEE 26th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2010)�#FunctionalProgramming �
* 6.�Qian, Z., et al.: Timestream: reliable stream computation in the cloud. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM European Conference on Computer Systems, pp. 1–14. ACM (2013)�#USA #Economy #Growth #Development �
* 7.�Akidau, T., et al.: Millwheel: fault tolerant stream processing at internet scale. Proc. VLDB Endowment 6(11), 1033–1044 (2013)�#EuropeanCommission #USA #Canada #Alliances #Relationships �
* 8.�Apache storm. https://storm.apache.org/. Accessed 20 Apr 2016��
* 9.�Neumeyer, B., Robbins, A.N., Kesari, A.: S4: distributed stream computing platform. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Wor
Jason Williamson and Safra Catz: Creating a Shared Sense of Time. Forging Economic and Spiritual Linkages for a Thriving Ecosystem and Team Success
Jason Williamson and Safra Catz: Creating a Shared Sense of Time. Forging Economic and Spiritual Linkages for a Thriving Ecosystem and Team Success
#Oracle #Spiritual #Economic #Linkages #DeepLearning
* 1.�Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: Mapreduce: simplifified data processing on large clusters. Commun. ACM 51(1), 107–113 (2008)��
* 2.�Isard, M., Budiu, M., Yu, Y., Birrell, A., Fetterly, D.: Dryad: distributed data-parallel programs from sequential building blocks. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 41(3), 59–72 (2007)�
* 3.�Saha, B., Shah, H., Seth, S., Vijayaraghavan, G., Murthy, A., Curino, C.: Apache tez: a unifying framework for modeling and building data processing applications. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 1357–1369. ACM (2015)��
* 4.�Zaharia, M., Chowdhury, M., Franklin, M.J., Shenker, S., Stoica, I.: Spark: cluster computing with working sets. In: Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, vol. 10, p. 10 (2010)��
* 5.�Shvachko, K., Kuang, H., Radia, S., Chansler, R.: The hadoop distributed fifile system. In: 2010 IEEE 26th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2010)��
* 6.�Qian, Z., et al.: Timestream: reliable stream computation in the cloud. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM European Conference on Computer Systems, pp. 1–14. ACM (2013)��
* 7.�Akidau, T., et al.: Millwheel: fault tolerant stream processing at internet scale. Proc. VLDB Endowment 6(11), 1033–1044 (2013)��
* 8.�Apache storm. https://storm.apache.org/. Accessed 20 Apr 2016��
* 9.�Neumeyer, B., Robbins, A.N., Kesari, A.: S4: distributed stream computing platform. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 170–177. IEEE (2010)��
* 10.�Kulkarni, S., et al.: Twitter heron: stream processing at scale. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Da
Ray Dalio: Extending Smart City as a Service, Smart Community as a Service, for Learning and Evolution in Kentucky.
Ray Dalio: Extending Smart City as a Service, Smart Community as a Service, for Learning and Evolution in Kentucky.
Audet Ch, Dennis JE (2003) Analysis of generalized pattern searches. SIAM J Optim 13(3):889–903
Konečný, J., McMahan, H.B., Ramage, D., et al.: Federated optimization: distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02527 (2016)
Zheng, L., Peng, J., Kan, H., Li, Y.: Several new infinite families of bent functions via second order derivatives. Cryptogr. Commun. 12(6), 1143–1160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12095-020-00436-0
Canetti, R., Hohenberger, S.: Chosen-ciphertext secure proxy re-encryption. In: 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 185–194. ACM (2007)
#Kentucky
#SmartCommunities
#SmartCityAsAService
#USA
#Economy
#UnifiedProcess �#RayDalio� #Principles
Jordan Etem: Connecting Seattle and Sydney, Smart City as a Service, Soul Sight and Imagination.
Connecting People:
Taylor Swift, Wayne Gretzky, Adena Friedman
�
With Community:
Seattle, Washington
Sydney, Australia
With Market:
Nasdaq, Connected Infrastructure, Multi-Cloud Computing.
#Seattle #Sydney #UnitedStates #Australia
#Motivation #Achievement #DeepLearning
#ConnectedEconomy #GlobalPartners #SoulSight
Mesnager, S.: Several new infinite families of bent functions and their duals. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 60(7), 4397–4407 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2014.2320974
Olsen, J., Scholtz, R.A., Welch, L.: Bent-function sequences. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 28(6), 858–864 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1982.1056589
Bargh, J. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2). New York: Guilford Press.
#Honor
Michael Dell and Elon Musk: Connecting and Uniting Israel and Dubai with Motivation and Achievement.
Michael Dell and Elon Musk: Connecting and Uniting Israel and Dubai with Motivation and Achievement.
“Do you see the consequences of the way we have chosen to think about success? Because we so profoundly personalize success, we miss opportunities to lift others onto the top rung...We are too much in awe of those who succeed and far too dismissive of those who fail. And most of all, we become much too passive. We overlook just how large a role we all play—and by “we” I mean society—in determining who makes it and who doesn’t.”
“The values of the world we inhabit and the people we surround ourselves with have a profound effect on who we are.”
“Those three things - autonomy, complexity and a connection between effort and reward - are, most people agree, the three qualities that work has to have if it is to be satisfying. It is not how much money we make that ultimately makes us happy between nine and five. It's whether our work fulfills us.”
― Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers: The Story of Success
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071.
DeMarree, K. G., Briňol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2014). The effects of power on prosocial outcomes: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 20–30.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
#Dell #Tesla #Israel #Dubai #UAE
#Motivation #Achievement #DeepLearning
#ConnectedEconomy #GlobalPartners #USA
United States, Canada, Mexico: Harmonious Intelligent Systems, Motivating Learning Network.
United States, Canada, Mexico:
Harmonious Intelligent Systems,
Motivating Learning Network.
Redana, S., Bulakci, Ö., Zafeiropoulos, A., et al. (2019). 5GPPP architecture working group: View on 5G architecture. European Commission.
Chih-Lin, I., Li, H., Korhonen, J., et al. (2017). RAN revolution with NGFI (xHaul) for 5G. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(2), 541–550.
Alimi, I. A., Teixeira, A. L., & Monteiro, P. P. (2017). Toward an efficient C-RAN optical fronthaul for the future networks: A tutorial on technologies, requirements, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(1), 708–769.
Monti, P., Li, Y., Mårtensson, J., et al. (2017). A flexible 5G RAN architecture with dynamic baseband split distribution and configurable optical transport. In 2017 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON) (pp. 1–1).
Arslan, M. Y., Sundaresan, K., & Rangarajan, S. (2015). Software-defined networking in cellular radio access networks: Potential and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(1), 150–156.
Marotta, A., Cassioli, D., Kondepu, K., et al. (2019). Exploiting flexible functional split in converged software defined access networks. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 11(11), 536–546.
Matoussi, S., Fajjari, I., Aitsaadi, N., et al. (2019). Joint functional split and resource allocation in 5G Cloud-RAN. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 1–7).
Fu, L. (1994), Neural Networks in Computer Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Gately, E. (1996), Neural Networks for Financial Forecasting, Wiley, New York.
Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 785–794 (2016)
Walczak, S. (1998), “Neural Network Models for A Resource Allocation Problem”, Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 28 B(2), 276–284.
Walczak, S.
Team Basics: Connecting communities with technology. For evolutionary progress. Improving Cloud Infrastructure, Improving Learning Networks, Regionally, Nationally, Globally.
Team Basics: Connecting communities with technology. For evolutionary progress. Improving Cloud Infrastructure, Improving Learning Networks, Regionally, Nationally, Globally.
#EmbeddedSystems #DistributedComputing #USA
J.A. Landay, B.A. Myers, Sketching interfaces: toward more human interface design. Computer 34(3), 56–64 (2001). issn: 0018-9162. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.910894
Li, Z. H.; Nie, F. P.; Chang, X. J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, C. Q.; Sebe, N. Dynamic affinity graph construction for spectral clustering using multiple features. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems Vol. 29, No. 12, 6323–6332, 2018.
Daly R, Shen Q. Methods to accelerate the learning of Bayesian network structures. In: Proceedings of the 2007 UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence; 2007.
Verma T, Pearl J. Equivalence and synthesis of causal models. Los Angeles, CA: Computer Science Department, UCLA; 1991.
Pangle, L. S. (2002). Aristotle and the philosophy of friendship. West Nyack: Cambridge University Press.
Schopenhauer, A. (1958). The world as will and representation (Vol. I) (trans: E. F. J. Payne). New York: Dover Publications. (Original Work published 1818).
Badhwar, N. K. (1987). Friends as ends in themselves. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48(1), 1–23.
Aflalo, Y.; Dubrovina, A.; Kimmel, R. Spectral generalized multi-dimensional scaling. International Journal of Computer Vision Vol. 118, No. 3, 380–392, 2016.
Delves LM, Mohamed JL (1985) Computational Methods for Integral Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Zubair, S., Wang, W.: Tensor dictionary learning with sparse tucker decomposition. In: 2013 18th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), pp. 1–6. IEEE, Piscataway (2013)
H. Asghari-Moghaddam, Y.H. Son, J.H. Ahn, N.S. Kim, Chameleon: versatile and practical near-DRAM acceleration architecture for large memory systems, in MICRO (2016)
K.K. Chang, P.J. Nair, D. Lee, S. Ghose, M.K. Qureshi,