Cancel Culture Catalog
An Archive Collection on Cancel Culture and Its Negatives
26/12/2022
Cancel Culture supports the spreading of inaccurate information that could stain one's reputation. It empowers those who portray its targets in a skewed and unjust light while neglecting the harmful impact it leaves by the perpetrators and bystanders.
Read more: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/defamation?authuser=0
23/12/2022
Radiate positivity, not negativity!
Cancel culture is a catalyst for bad press, particularly on social media, which the Filipino population uses extensively and in enormous numbers. People are being canceled for misunderstandings, opinions, and creativity; thus, the toxic environment it emits.
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/publicity?authuser=0
23/12/2022
Lights, Camera, Canceled!
The celebrity culture in the Philippines impose certain constraints towards Filipino celebrities because of their “obligation” to express an opinion favored by the public as part of their work.
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/case-study?authuser=0
23/12/2022
Dangers of Cancel Culture As Digital Activism
Through online activism and mobilizations by digital platforms, people become aware and participate in particular issues that require social or political reforms. But how effective is cancel culture in bringing about change, and what are its flaws that make it more detrimental to the cause than beneficial?
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/activism
21/12/2022
Boxing? No, DOXING!
Internet Doxing is becoming a tool for cancel culture. Using internet doxing is a method of disclosing personal information about someone online because individuals consider canceling culture simply about holding influential people accountable.
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/doxing?authuser=0
21/12/2022
One mistake, and you are vilified on a mass scale…
Cancel culture does not provide an allowance for mistakes or a room for change and growth. Despite being pervasive nowadays, it is ineffective, fails to promote social change, and tolerates cyberbullying.
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/bullying?authuser=0
21/12/2022
Cancel culture: Is it an avenue for free speech, or an impediment to it?
Cancel culture is not a black-and-white concept but rather a gray area in our free speech. It holds people accountable, yet it also instills fear in them. It is a powerful tool for democracy, and it can initiate change if used rightly, but it is also prone to misuse and abuse.
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/free-speech?authuser=0
20/12/2022
An effective manifestation of social awareness, or an impediment to our democracy?
When it comes to our local political landscape, some would argue that cancel culture is an effective tool for social change while others think that it is only harmful to our democracy. But like all things, there is a good and a bad side to it.
READ : https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/politics?authuser=0
20/12/2022
Cancel Culture…It is found guilty!
Under the defamation and libel case of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines, cancel culture is considered a malicious crime and people can be punished for such action; however, it is complicated to go through (before and after the trial).
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/law?authuser=0
20/12/2022
To cancel, to be canceled, and to watch all this happening…
Cancel culture is detrimental to each and every one’s mental health. It does not matter if you are just a bystander – you WILL BE affected.
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/mental-health?authuser=0
20/12/2022
“Target locked,” said cancel culture.
Recognize the people who are the intended targets of cancel culture, including well-known individuals like Donnalyn Bartomole, Ella Cruz, etc.
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/targets?authuser=0
20/12/2022
See the third party in cancel culture!
In general, the reality is that cancel culture’s efficacy is defined by the existence and severity of offline repercussions by a third party, therefore relying on the status quo, as opposed to the size of an online movement for change.
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/efficacy?authuser=0
20/12/2022
History... Does It Truly Repeat Itself?
"Cancel culture," the belief that individuals too often heap blame on others for negative behavior. We are aware that nothing is off boundaries in terms of what we are capable of conquering. When will it END?
READ: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/cancel-culture-catalog/articles/history?authuser=0
19/12/2022
Have any of you ever felt excluded? Isolated? Lonely? Judged? Cancellation, for many of us, is the cruelest punishment imaginable as peer rejection is immensely demoralizing. To further illustrate the negatives of "cancel culture", we are pleased to share our archive analysis, the Cancel Culture Catalog.
Utilizing the , collectively, we stand by the argument that cancel culture, despite it being a modern social justice practice, should not be normalized as it brings harm and creates an environment where harassment and ostracism are tolerated and accepted.
Taking one side, the authors will individually discuss cancel culture’s history, efficacy, targets, effect on mental health, and its relation to law, politics, freedom of speech, bullying, and disinformation. Moreover, the archive will talk about how the culture is defamatory, how it acts as a negative form of activism, and look at a specific case study.