Hridyansh and Associates

Wishes U & Ur family members a very Happy Independence Day & Raksha Bandhan.

Hridyansh Associates

Burden is upon Complainant to proven alteration of name of Payee was made by Accused himself: Kerala HC
Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881

Indra Sarma vs. V.K.V.Sarma, 2013

The recent judgment of the Supreme Court has illustrated five categories where the concept of live in relationships can be considered and proved in the court of law. Following are the categories:

1. Domestic relationship between an adult male and an adult female, both unmarried. It is the most uncomplicated sort of relationship
2. Domestic relationship between a married man and an adult unmarried woman, entered knowingly.
3. Domestic relationship between an adult unmarried man and a married woman, entered knowingly. Such relationship can lead to a conviction under Indian Penal Code for the crime of adultery
4. Domestic relationship between an unmarried adult female and a married male, entered unknowingly
5. Domestic relationship between same s*x partners ( gay or le***an)

Insurance Claim can't be denied on the ground of Common Lifestyle Diseases like diabetes.
* National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission- Neelam Chopra vs LIC, Dt. (08.10.2018) *

उपयुक्त संतुष्टि के बिना डीएनए टेस्ट का आदेश नहीं दिया जा सकता, सुप्रीम कोर्ट का जजमेंट.
🎗Hridyansh Associates 🎗

रोक के आदेश पर 6 महीने की समय सीमा सुप्रीम कोर्ट पर लागू नहीं होती, पढ़िए सुप्रीम कोर्ट का फैसला
🎗Hridyansh Associates 🎗

गर्भावस्था समाप्त करने की समय सीमा 12 से बढ़कर 24/ 26 सप्ताह तक हो सकती है
🎗Hridyansh Associates 🎗

1. Tampering with computer source documents Section 65
2. Hacking with computer System, data alteration Section 66
3. Sending offensive messages through communication device Section 66A
4. Dishonestly receiving stolen computer resource or communication device Section 66B
5. Identity theft Section 66C
6. Cheating by personation by using computer resource Section 66D
7. Violation of privacy Section 66E
8. Cyber terrorisum Section 66F
9. Publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic from Section 67
10. Publishing or transmitting of material containing s*xually explicit act, etc. in electronic from Section 67A
*Hridyansh and Associates*

LANDMARK JUDGMENTS RELATING TO CRIMINAL LAW :(Posted by Hridyansh and Associates)

1. Lalita Kumari v. State of UP
:FIR mandatory in cognizable cases

2. Mohd. Ahmad Khan vs Shah Bano Begum
:Section 125 of CrPC Secular

3. D.K. Basu v. State of Bengal
:SC guidelines relating to rights of the arrested person

4. Nilabati Bahera v. State of Orissa
:Compensation in case of unlawful arrest and detention

5. Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra
:Rights of women relating to arrest

6. Joginder Kumar v. State of UP
:SC guidelines relating to rights of the arrested person

7. Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha
:Right of maintenance in Live-in-Relationships

8. Shiv Shankar Singh v. State of Bihar
:Filing of Multiple FIR

9. Satya Pal Singh v. State of MP
:Father of deceased victim has right to appeal

10. State of UP v. Singhara Singh
:Section 164 by necessary implication prohibits the magistrate from giving oral evidence of the confession made to him

11. State of Madhya Pradesh v. Rustum
:Computation of period of 60/90 Days u/s 167 of CrPC

12. CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni
:Police Remand can not exceed 15 Days

13. Mubarak Ali v. State of Bombay
:Offence triable where the act is done

14. Shakuntala Devi v. State of U.P.
:Availability of Civil Remedy does not bar filing of a case u/s 200 of CrPC

15. Dina Nath v. Emperor
:No summary trial in serious or complicated cases

16. Surendra Singh v. State of UP
:Where a Judge who wrote the Judgment dies before it was delivered or pronounced, another Judge can not deliver it

17. Naresh v. State of UP
:Alteration of Conviction u/s 302 IPC to one u/s 304 IPC by HC is not justified u/s 362 of CrPC

18. Ashok Kumar v. UOI
:Constitutional validity of Section 433-A of CrPC

19. Rasiklal v. Kishore Khanchand Wadhwani
:Right to bail u/s 436 in bailable offences is an absolute and indefeasible right

20. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
:SC guidelines relating to anticipatory bail.

अयोध्या मामले की सुनवाई सप्ताह में 3 दिन की बजाय अब पाँचों दिन होगी।
लटकाने नहीं निपटाने का दौर शुरू।
🎗Hridyansh and Associates 🎗

JI 1952-2019. A brilliant parliamentarian, a fine bilingual orator- she was inspiring. She epitomised dignity, commitment to democratic norms, grace in politics.

The Centre revoked Article 370 and 35(A) today, through a Presidential Order.
All provisions of the Indian Constitution shall now be applicable to J&K.
Home Minister Amit Shah also moved a Bill to birfurcate the state into two union territories-- proposing J&K to be a UT with a state legislature and Ladakh as a UT without legislature.