MenToo

It's just a competition for positions offered by some rich Corporate and Governing body of men.

And in desperate attempt to compete, feminists actually work and strengthen the same well-positioned men whom they think they should acquire positions of or be equals with!

Neither can you say, "a cow and and an ox are equal", nor should you say, "a woman and a man are equal". Both the statements, in their actual sense are absurd!

One might say, "men and women are equal", just by uttering it.

But they remain what they are, in reality!

♀️=♂️ EQUALITY RESULTS IN INJUSTICE!

A systematic compulsion to equate men and women i.e., Male & Female; by which, such equality is resulting in injustice!

Equality results in injustice when equal share of inheritance is given to a male and a female child; when though, a male and female are not enjoined by 'equal responsibilities'.

Is a man who is enjoined by the responsibility of providing for a family and a woman who is only expected to provide for herself – same?

A man, who by all his earnings is expected to provide to all the members of his family and a woman who is only expected to provide for herself – Same?

Are some of you out of your senses?

Then, how is that you ask for a 'equal share'?

Are women providing to their parents? Are women coming forward, saying, "we will provide to the men we marry."?

Are women, who are earning, marrying non-earning men?

If not, why not!

Is the wealth required for the sustenance of a complete family, which a man is expected to provide; and the wealth required for the sustenance of a single woman – same?

So, why is that you ask for a 'equal share'?

Have men gone blind? Can't they differentiate between their own expenses and their fellow women's expenses?

Explicitly or atleast implicitly; are'nt married men enumerating their own expenses?

Or do you think, that the courts have ordered, that from now onwards, women similar to that of men are required to provide for their families and the men they marry?

Has anything changed in this regard?

Is the responsibility to pay maintainance now on women?

Then why is that you ask for a EQUAL SHARE in INHERITANCE, when ONLY ONE of you is enjoined by a GREATER SHARE OF EXPENDITURE?

A MARRIED WORKING WOMAN IS DEPENDENT ON TWO MEN FINANCIALLY

When she boastfully says, "I am independent"; what she really means saying is - 'I am not just dependent on you' .

Unlike yourself, as she now finds herself acquiring benefits from two different ways; she has the 'choice' to not just depend on you at any point, if she desires!

So she places herself in a secure position, if in case you failed to deliver; she may take the advantage of NOT BEING DEPENDENT on you.

If I should compare it with an workplace example - it is like that of an insecure employee who fears unemployment. And in being insecure, that if in case he looses his livelihood, and instead of working smart; what this employee actually does is... Applying and working for two employers at same time. So if in case, one opportunity fails; the other remains, at least!

So, when she says, "I am independent"; she doesn't mean as really independent as such!

What she really means saying is - 'I am not just dependent on you', as she now has additional depending choices!

But in anyways, NOT CARING ABOUT YOU.

Ooo Men! Why would you let women have a definite percentage of seats in the positions of administration and power, when you don't have similar percentage of women participating in positions that lack power?

Ask yourself: How many women you know are aiming to become masons or carpenters or coal miners? But you would rather find around you a dozen of them, aiming to be in positions of Administration, Management and Power!

Isn't it?

Would you give them those positions without you even participating?

And let's say, 'if you were in the position of authority to choose'; Would you rather choose a woman in a given position even when you have a more capable, righteous and experienced man beside?

If then, why would you choose Equality over Justice?

And how many women that earn are providing for their parents, their husbands and their children, responsibly, for a lifetime?

And what guarantees you to think, that the more you let them rule over you; you would be taken care off, by them, just like you did, as men; when men like you were in positions?

Think about it!

#33%women

This One Goes For The Feminists: A Feed For Their Thought!

Many of you say, "I believe in Gender Equality", but in reality do not actually feel so!

If you really believe in 'Gender Equality', then ask every 'Married Working Woman' any of the following three questions:

1. Why would you earn when your husband is providing?

or

2. Why do you take provision from your husband while you are, on one hand, earning?

or atleast,

3. How much of your earnings do you give to your husband?

There Is No Greatness In Gender Equality, Except In Advertising Fancy Lies For Hiring Women Like 'Financial Independence', 'Women Empowerment', 'Women's Liberation', 'Breaking Stereotypes' and Blah Blah Blah!

On the other hand, this benefits Corporations, as they can pay even less, seeing the demand, having more applicants for a single job posted!

This page! is a reminder to men that you must understand your own rights before you educate yourselves with women's rights.

In answering the concerns addressed by a follower, this page isn't anti feminist as one may presume; your presumptions are yours.

To be precise, this doesn't even acknowledge the rightful existence of feminism, even though a group of women and men consider themselves as feminists.

It's they themselves are considering themselves as feminists; considers them as a bunch of segregated beings.

Who ever puts an equal symbol between a Man & a Woman, a Cow & an Ox, a C**k & a Hen or any Male & a Female is presumably misguided. It's like saying, "north pole and south pole are equal" - A blunder!

So for a misguided group like feminism, their ideological existence is their own delusion. Their communion is their own self-segregation.

So this doesn't intend to harm them.

Lo! Who harms a people whose ideology is harmful to themselves; an idealogy of never ending desperation to equate the inequal!

Has there ever been a time in history where WOMEN WERE TAXED? It's all new for 21st Century! You see... extra works & extra taxes!
Do they call this WOMEN EMPOWERMENT?

Are women saying,"we must protect the rights of men"?

If not; why not?

So why is it only men, and that too initiated by some well established men, consider themselves as protectors of women's rights?

For such men, aren't women on par enough to contain their own rights and by any measure see that the rights of their fellow men were also contained?

Why care to show respect when you don't get it back with same esteem? So men, have some self-respect!