I stand for Biafra

ICC and ICJ: There was a genocide committed by the Nigerian government against the Biafran people between 1967 and 1970.

The Biafran people are waiting for YOU.

and ICJ: There was a genocide committed by the Nigerian government against the Biafran people between 1967 and 1970.

The Biafran people are waiting for YOU.

and ICJ: There was a genocide committed by the Nigerian government against the Biafran people between 1967 and 1970.

The Biafran people are waiting for YOU.

After the destruction of Landmark, the Lagos state government reverted to the original plan. This means that the Landmark was destroyed for nothing.

But the most annoying thing there is that an Igbo man in the person of Dave Umahi was used to achieve this.

Why are they always using Igbo men for this?

It is a sign of a conquered people. 90 per cent of Igbo men in Nigeria's government are puppets and slaves.

Many governors were put on seats by Fulani. Governors like Soludo, Uzodimma, Mba and Ebonyi governor. The only difference is that Soludo and Ebonyi governors were installed indirectly by the Fulani while the rest were installed directly.

Presently, the only people's governor is Mazi Oti, the Abia state governor.

People who can't determine who rules them are conquered people. They bring men ready to work against their own people to rule, and they empower men like themselves.

Had it been Umahi refused to destroy that Landmark, the caliphate and their Yoruba wives would get another Igbo man to do the job.

Elochukwu Ohagi, 2024.

BREAKING: Nnamdi Kanu Files Objection, Challenging Nigerian Court's Jurisdiction To Try Him

Kanu filed the notice of preliminary objection on the strength of Sections 1(3); 6(6); 12; 36(2): 36(8): 42; 45 and 251(1)(q) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended)

The detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has filed a preliminary objection before the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, challenging the court's jurisdiction to try him.

Kanu in the notice of preliminary objection to jurisdiction of the court filed on Monday through his legal team led by his special counsel, Barrister Aloy Ejimakor, told the court that it has no jurisdiction to try him, stressing that charges filed against him before the court by the Nigerian government are unconstitutional.

Kanu filed the notice of preliminary objection on the strength of Sections 1(3); 6(6); 12; 36(2): 36(8): 42; 45 and 251(1)(q) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended);

Section 178 of the Customs and Excise Management Act (as repealed); Sections 218 (1) & (2) and 220 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015; The Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act 2013 (as repealed) and Under the inherent jurisdiction of the Court.

He said that the court has no jurisdiction to try him on counts 1,2,4,5 and 8, on the points and authorities to the extent that the provisions of the Terrorism Prevention and Amendment Act 2013 (TPAA) enabled the Nigerian government to determine questions arising in the administration of TPAA which led to the ex parte order of proscription of IPOB and its declaration as a terrorist group and the gazetting of such order (without giving the Applicant an opportunity to make representations to the authorities), is void for being inconsistent with the provisions of Section 36(2) of Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) (CFRN or the Constitution).

The legal team said that Section 36(2) of the Constitution provides, “Without prejudice to the foregoing provisions of this section, a law shall not be invalidated by reason only that it confers on any government or authority power to determine questions arising in the administration of a law that affects or may affect the civil rights and obligations of any person if such law:

"(a) provides for an opportunity for the persons whose rights and obligations may be affected to make representations to the administering authority before that authority makes the decision affecting that person; and

"(b) contains no provision making the determination of the administering authority final and conclusive."

The IPOB leader prayed the court for “An order of this Honorable Court declining jurisdiction to entertain counts 1,2,3, 4,5 and 8 of the charges against the defendant/applicant or to quash said Counts on the ground that the Law upon which said Counts are predicated is unconstitutional.; and Law under which Applicant is being tried in these Counts has otherwise been repealed.

“An order of this Honourable Court declining jurisdiction to entertain count 3 of the charges against the defendant/applicant or to quash said Count on the ground that the said Count is unconstitutional, it is not supported by proof of evidence and is otherwise an abuse of process.

“An order of this Honorable Court declining jurisdiction to entertain counts 1,2,4,5 and 8 of the charges against the defendant/applicant or to quash said Counts on the ground that the Applicant is misled by the absence of, or the failure to state the place of commission of the alleged offenses and the specific dates of the broadcasts alleged.

“An order of this Honorable Court declining jurisdiction to entertain count 15 of the charges or to quash said Count on the ground that the said Count is not in compliance with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act; is not within the territorial jurisdiction of this Honorable Court; and is not supported by any proof of evidence; and Law under which Applicant is being tried in these Counts has otherwise been repealed.

“And for such further order(s) as this Honorable court may deem fit to make in the circumstance.”

The preliminary objection to the court’s jurisdiction was sequel to the ruling by Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday afternoon where she dismissed Kanu's fresh application seeking the restoration of his revoked bail and his removal from the DSS custody to a house arrest or prison custody.

SaharaReporters had reported that the judge who dismissed the application for lacking in merit, said that Kanu had brought the same application before the court.

Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2023 that Kanu did not jump bail, Justice Nyako said that she found, as a fact, that the IPOB leader jumped the bail granted to him earlier, and that he escaped out of Nigeria.

Justice Nyako further ruled that the sureties who stood for Kanu in the earlier bail, had applied to be discharged, and had been discharged on the ground that they could not locate Kanu and did not know his whereabouts.

The judge held that the only option left for Kanu was to go to the Court of Appeal and should proceed to the appellate court to exercise his right of appeal.

Justice Nyako disagreed with Kanu’s lead counsel, that the Supreme Court held that the earlier bail granted him, ought not to have been revoked, saying that she had perused the Supreme Court judgment copy, and did not see the claim by Kanu’s lawyer.

Reacting to the judge’s ruling, Kanu blasted the Nigerian government for violating the provisions of Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act by seeking to try him, saying that Nigerian courts seeking to try him is an act of terrorism.

In the preliminary objection notice, the IPOB leader’s legal team further asked the court to take notice that at the hearing of the preliminary objection, the Defendant shall, in addition to the affidavit, exhibits and the Written Address filed before it, rely on the following grounds:

“Regarding counts 1,2,3,4,5 and 8, the provisions of the Terrorism Prevention Act 2011 (as amended in 2013) under which the IPOB was proscribed and declared a terrorist group are inconsistent with the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution, and are thus void to the extent of the inconsistency.

“Regarding counts 1,2,3,4,5 and 8, there is a subsisting judgment of a High Court to the effect that the executive action leading to the declaration of IPOB as a terrorist group and its proscription is unconstitutional.

“Regarding counts 1,2,3,4,5 and 8, there are two international tribunal decisions against the arrest, detention, prosecution and trial of the Applicant which are, by virtue of the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution, binding on the Complainant and this Honorable Court.

“Count 3 of the charges against the defendant/applicant is unconstitutional as it seeks to punish the applicant for an act that was not a crime when it occurred and is otherwise an abuse of process.

“The Law under which Applicant is being tried in Counts 1,2,3,4,5 and 8 has been repealed.

“Counts 1,2,3,4,5 and 8 are incurably defective as the Applicant is misled by the failure to state the place or where the alleged offenses were committed and the specific dates of the alleged broadcasts.

“Count 15 is not in compliance with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act; it is not within the territorial jurisdiction of this Honorable Court; and it is not supported by any proof of evidence; and Law under which Applicant is being tried in these Counts has otherwise been repealed.”

The notice noted that “This Honorable Court has the constitutional vires and the inherent jurisdiction to interpret the Constitution and the laws of the Federation of Nigeria.”

PRESS RELEASE,
29/04/2024.

JUSTICE BINTA NYAKO, DO YOU THINK IPOB MEMBERS ARE ALAMAJIRIS IN NORTHERN NIGERIA? - IPOB

Following the continuous insistence of Justice Binta Nyako to detain Mazi Nnamdi KANU in solitary confinement and disrespect of the Supreme court orders to restore Mazi Nnamdi Okwu Kanu's former bail conditions, she unjustly revoked, we the global family and movement of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) ably led by the same indomitable leader Mazi Nnamdi KANU maintains our position that Justice Binta Nyako should step down from the case of our Leader; and we pull her ears to stop her hesitation to step down from Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's case or she must restore Mazi Nnamdi KANU's last bail conditions according to the Supreme Court of Nigeria's rulings and orders.

The insistence and disobedience of Justice Binta Nyako to not heed the Supreme Court judgment for unjustly revoking his bail. This remains one of the reasons it is believed that Fulani men and women are busy destroying Nigeria's integrity and image across the globe.

Justice Binta Nyako do you think you are dealing with Alamajiris? Why would you shamelessly say in the open court that you have not read the Supreme Court judgement that remitted back the case file to you? If you had read the decisions and conclusions reached in the said judgement, you would have read where the Supreme Court questioned your impartiality. You would have seen that your handling of this issue was castigated by the justices of the apex court, the same way the Appeal Court admonished you for a similar biased attitude and continuous adjuornments of the case.

In which country can a High Court judge say he/she will not obey a Supreme Court decision? This is the genesis of lawlessness in Nigeria. A country where a High Court judge can openly boast that she would not obey an explicit directive from the Supreme Court. If a judge has no regard for the pronouncement of the apex court in the land, how can anyone expect lawless entities like the DSS to obey court orders. Judges like Binta Nyako are why there is a climate of disobedience to valid court orders in Nigeria.

We would like to remind Justice Nyako that Nigeria's supposedly inviolable 1999 Constitution said in Section 287(1) "The decisions of the Supreme Court shall be enforced in any part of the Federation by all authorities and persons, and by COURTS with subordinate jurisdiction to that of the Supreme Court". Then why is Justice Nyako refusing to follow the Supreme Court's directive to restore Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's previous bail conditions which she revoked unjustly?

COMRADE EMMA POEERFUL,MEDIA, AND PUBLICITY SECRETARY FOR IPOB

Binta Nyako, Her Husband Murtala Nyako And Mazi Nnamdi Kanu' Court Case

Have you ever asked why Binta Nyako? Why was she the choice of the Nigerian government in the case of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu? Was it accidental or could it be something arranged by the powers that be?

Looking so far at Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's case lots of things have refused to add up. The government have been disobeying court orders, with the judge doing absolutely nothing. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has seen his case dismissed by the appeal court, saying his kidnap was illegal and should not stand trial anywhere in Nigeria, yet upon going back to the High Court under Her Lordship Binta Nyako, she refused to even grant MNk bail. She even refused to have him put in House arrest or at worse sent to Kuje prison. The question every sane person should be asking is this.

Is Binta Nyako being teleguided by some powerful individual in the government? This can't be answered without bringing the problems being faced by her Husband Governor Murtala Nyako in the hands of the Nigerian government. In 2015, after the governor returned from one-year self-imposed exile, he was arrested by the operatives of EFCC.
The EFCC had declared Mr Nyako and his son AbdulAziz Murtala Nyako, a retired naval officer, wanted for alleged criminal conspiracy, stealing, abuse of office and money laundering.

After Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was arrested in 2015, he was arraigned in Binta Nyako's court, the same woman the government is trying both her husband and son over corruption. Are you thinking what I am thinking? Could it be they gave her the case with the hope of using her son and husband's case to remote control her in the case of MNK?

Do you think MNK will get justice in the hands of a woman whom the government is trying her husband and son over numerous corruption charges? In 2022, Buhari opted to settle with Murtala Nyako out of the court.
Again, just on 21 March 2024, People Gazette reported that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission re-arraigned ex-Governor Murtala Nyako and his son, Abdulaziz, before the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court on Thursday over alleged N29 billion fraud.

What does this tell you? The Tinubu government is about to use such cases to put Binta Nyako online so that she will not grant justice to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Every Biafran must connect the dot now. See what is going on now and start shouting it.

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu deserves justice. It is abnormal to use the corruption charges levelled against the husband of a judge to force her into twisting justice.

Every man deserves justice.

Below is Justice Evoh Chukwu, one of the Judges at the Federal High Court Abuja, Nigeria.

Justice Evoh Chukwu was the High Court judge handling the case between justice Binta Nyako's husband Murtala Nyako and son AbdulAziz. The two, a former governor and Senator representing Adamawa Central were accused of 29 billion naira theft by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

It is painful that Justice Evoh Chukwu on June 9, 2016 was reported dead after what was said to be a brief illness. Before he died as the trial judge in the case involving the Federal Government's EFCC and Nyako's family, he granted Binta Nyako's husband and son bail, but the bail conditions were not yet met, followed by Chief Justice Evoh Chukwu's death.

Then another Chief Judge took over the case, but was later transferred to another court, leaving the case again to the mercy of a new Chief Judge Peter Lifu.

The Federal Government of Nigeria has threatened Binta Nyako that if she release Nnamdi Kanu, her husband and son will remain in custody, but if she can help to lawlessly victimize and jail Nnamdi Kanu, her husband and son will be released.

This is why justice Binta Nyako is desperate to accelerate the hearing of Kanu's case, so as to pass her judgement against Nnamdi Kanu in swap for her husband and son who have been detained since 2015.

For now, no one can tell if the deceitful Federal Government of Nigeria will fulfill this bogus promise they made to Binta Nyako if she succeeds in jailing Nnamdi Kanu but, that is the deal they have entered.

In their recent court appearance in March 21, 2024, the two accused Nyakos pleaded that their surties are now available and that they have met all their bail conditions. They pleaded that the court should allow them to present their bail conditions previously given by late justice Evoh Chukwu.

The trial judge Peter Lifu responded "I hope they have not Japa "left the country" and that was how the hearing for the day ended.

The Federal High Court have not accepted nor rejected their plea to present their bail conditions but we are convinced that the trial judge, Peter Lifu is acting on the orders of the Federal Government to delay it so as to wait for the outcome of Binta Nyako's accelerated Nnamdi Kanu case.

If Chief Justice Binta Nyako succeeds in jailing Nnamdi Kanu, Justice Peter Lifu in the other case involving her husband and son will then ask them to present their bail conditions for their release. But if she did not succeed, her husband and son will remain in custody.

With this, the Indigenous People Of Biafra (IPOB) have lost confidence in justice Binta Nyako as the trial judge to the case of their leader, Nnamdi Kanu and demand that justice Binta Nyako gently and honorably steps down from the case which has already been won by Nnamdi Kanu but still lingering on because of the Federal Government's disobedience and secret plans to lawlessly jail Nnamdi Kanu

Written by: Ifeanyi Chibueze James for

Family Writers Press International

Juatice Nyako is under instruction to jail Kanu by Tinubu led Government, She Must recuse herself and step down - IPOB

IPOB press release
Published On the Bifra Post
April 22, 2024

The global family and movement of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) ably led by the prophet and indefatigable leader, Mazi Nnamdi Okwuckuwu KANU condemns the Nigeria Government's political and judiciary persecution of our leader using Justice Binta Nyako of the Abuja High Court. Justice Binta Nyako is a political stooge for the Federal Government of Nigeria who has used her court to persecute and deny Mazi Nnamdi Kanu his fundamental human rights for years.

During the last court appearance of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu on April 17, 2024, Justice Binta Nyako openly threatened to adjourn the case indefinitely because she was not allowed the liberty to execute the scripted judgement against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu handed to her by the Nigerian government. The visibly angry Judge Nyako's threatening proved that she was highly compromised. She is being manipulated and controlled by the executive branch of the Nigerian government via the Ministry of Justice. Justice Binta Nyako has made herself an interested party in Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's case instead of being a non-partisan and unbiased judge. A judge that has no control over her court should not handle a high-profile case like that of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Justice Binta Nyako should redeem herself and recuse herself or step down from Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's case because she is already compromised and controlled by those who sent her because of their political interests.

Since the kidnap and rendition of Mazi Nnamdi KANU in June 2021, and illegal arraignment before Justice Binta Nyako's Court without legal representation, Justice Binta Nyako has not given Mazi Nnamdi KANU breathing space to express himself in order to allow for a fair hearing. She has always displayed personal hatred against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu in her court. Maybe she wants a pound of flesh of Mazi Nnamdi KANU for forming the Eastern Security Network, ESN, who are dislodging her kingsmen, the Fulani murderous, terrorists herdsmen matitia, from Biafran bushes and forests. Even though the Supreme Court, in their weakness, ruled that the Nigeria government committed an international crime in bringing Mazi Nnamdi Kanu back to Nigeria. Also, the same Supreme Court ruled that the Nigerian military invasion of Mazi Kanu's residence on 14th of September 2017 was responsible for him fleeing and that Justice Binta Nyako should have not revoked his bail. Justice Binta Nyako should have reinstated Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's bail and apologized to him for tampering with his fundamental human rights. No! She never reinstated Mazi Kanu's bail. Instead, she refused Mazi Kanu's fresh applications for bail or transfer from the DSS solidarity confinement to a Correctional Center because she has a hidden hatred and agenda.

The actions and antecedent of Binta Nyako indicated that she will rule against this innocent man for reason best known to her, Maybe he, KANU, inaugurated vigilant group treating to destroy her people who have been ra**ng our women in the bushes and forests and also murdering our people across southern Nigeria.

Justice Binta Nyako was handed an already scripted judgment, and she is under instructions to jail Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. That's why she rejected every application to grant Mazi Nnamdi Kanu bail or transfer him to Correctional Center but insisted on accelerated hearing so she can deliver her agreed upon sentence with the federal government of Nigeria. She is in a hurry to pronounce the scripted judgment from Bola Almed Tinubu's government to jail Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. Justice Binta Nyako was selected because her husband was among former governors who looted their state treasuries with pending cases at the EFCC. She has an order to jail Mazi Nnamdi Kanu in lieu of her husband's freedom from EFCC harassment. IPOB demands that she rescue herself and save herself and her family of shame and unforgivable erroneous judgment.

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is a lawful Biafran Self- Determination Activist. He was unlawfully kidnapped and extraordinarily renditioned to Nigeria by the Nigerian government. The Supreme Court of Nigeria on the 15th of December ruled that the Nigeria government violated international laws on extraction in bringing him back to Nigeria, though the Apex Court was under political pressure not to deliver justice. In the place of justice, the Justices who are under pressure to deliver justice for Nigeria. The judges at the Apex Court sent the case back to Justice Binta Nyako, who is an executive stooge to continue the political trial and persecution of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

IPOB commended the courage of the Justices at the Appeal Court, who refused to be intimidated but delivered a balanced judgment by discharging and acquitting Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. The Nigeria Government should save themselves and Biafrans time and resources by releasing Mazi Nnamdi Kanu unconditionally in line with the Appeal Court judgment, apologize, and dialogue with Mazi Nnamdi Okwuchukwu KANU IPOB stands on the Judgments of Appeal Court of October 13, 2022. On that judgment, we stand.

COMRADE EMMA POWERFUL, MEDIA, AND PUBLICITY SECRETARY FOR IPOB..

http://www.thebiafrapost.com/2024/04/juatice-nyako-is-under-instruction-to.html

the links to continue reading @

http://www.thebiafrapost.com/2024/04/juatice-nyako-is-under-instruction-to.html
👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼

http://www.thebiafrapost.com/2024/04/juatice-nyako-is-under-instruction-to.html

The Biafra Post: Juatice Nyako is under instruction to jail Kanu by Tinubu led Government, She Must recuse herself and step down - IPOB # #

Someone said, Yorubas are not attacking the Igbo attire rather, for the fact that an Igbo man is running a successful int'l aviation company it gets them infuriated. He said if the aviation company is a building situated in Lagos by now they would have demolished it and tag it illegal structure.

If the owner of Air Peace is a Fulani man and he uses Arab wears as crew dress code, this same set of ethic bigots won't say pim.

BREAK UP NIGERIA LET EVERYBODY GO THEIR SEPARATE WAYS.

The hate is real and we are tired.
.

An open latter by Fada Oluoma to Mathias Ezeaku - Gospel of truth: It Reads

For educational purposes

"FIRST LETTER TO MATHIAS EZEAKU.
Dear Mathias,
We serve God bc of two fundamental reasons: creation and redemption. All religions, including the one practiced by our ancestors whom you have become a convert apostle acknowledge God as creator. How they worship or conceive this 'creator God' definitely differs.

Common sense and intelligence agree that whoever is behind the origin of every person and things in the world deserves worship, that's the being we Christians worship.

Redemption is fundamentally a Christian mystery and doctrine. This is where Jesus Christ comes in. Majority of Christians believe that the creator God, though one, is three persons( father, son and Spirit).

To save humanity from eternal damnation, God the son(Jesus Christ) became man, suffered, died for our sins and rose again. In his name, repentance is preached to all people.
This historical Jesus Christ was not an European, Christianity didn't start in Europe either. Jesus was a Jew and Christianity started in Israel and spread out.

You always spew this falsehood that Christianity was brought to Africa by the Europeans to enslave us. Long before Christianity came to Africa, your ancestors were practicing slavery. There were slaves in igbo land and most other places before Christianity came. I'm sure you are aware of the osu and ohu practices.

You also accuse Jesus of being the reason your people are not developing. You treacherously forget to acknowledge that most of the things you are advertising as solutions to our problems like education, medical facilities, industries etc came to our shore first through Christianity.

The educational system that leads to the production of most of these modern technologies or systems you are advocating for is called western education, I can tell you authoritatively that most of it started from the church.

Scholarship, industry and organized systems are traceable to monastic life. This alone exposes your diatribe against Christianity and the church as malicious and false.

I challenge you to name one thing those who practiced the kind of religion you are advocating now invented that everyone is using, while I can give you an endless list of the things you and everyone else is using that came from people who practice Judaeo Christian faith.

You take flight, the pioneers of aircraft were the Wright Brothers, Wilbur and Orville. Their dad was a Christian clergy man, they believed in Jesus Christ and worshipped him as God. Oya tell me which one adherents of the religion you are agitating for pioneered.

From the car you drive, to the electronics you use, to the medical treatments you receive, to the phones you use, this internet you are using to propagate your views and more than 95% of the things you use everyday, I can bet that more than 70% of them are Western inventions or products.

May I inform you that Western civilization is built on Judaeo Christian traditions, this is why majority of the world's scientists, inventors and winners of the Noble prizes on different areas are Christians and Jews. You can Google it.

If Jesus were "useless", you wouldn't even be alive to make that statement twice Because his followers would have lynched you. The reason we will never do that is bc he told us never to fight physically for him, but to bless even those who curse us or Him. More importantly, if Jesus were "useless", you wouldn't be enjoying most of the things his followers invented.

I do agree with you that a certain version of Christianity or Jesus preached by a certain breed of priests and pastors in Nigeria is not just fake but criminal. Jesus didn't die to make anyone financially wealthy, the bible never mentioned that either, there's no one in the bible that Jesus Christ made rich.

So all those who preach a Jesus that solves peoples existential problems by miracles or any other spiritual means are charlatans, and we have many of them. If their prosperity by miracle works, they should have made everyone in their villages wealthy by now, but check all of them that preach that fake gospel, they always look for lands in big cities to build ministries.

The Bible and the church make it clear that a well organized society with competent political and civil leaders are what a country needs to prosper and live in peace. A country where hard and honest work is rewarded, opportunities created, is where prosperity happens, not a country with big church auditoriums and miracle crusades taking place everyday.

So you have to isolate the fake Jesus and fake Christianity that some gospel merchants in Nigeria are propagating for their self interest from the true and authentic Christian faith. The most prosperous nations in the world are Christian in origin and identity, so Christianity is not the problem.

You must also learn the difference between criticism and blasphemy. Against false prophets who are ripping our people off in the name of Jesus and Christianity, I'm with you in calling out their cruel manipulation, we can do this without mocking the Lord Jesus Christ and the Christian faith.

For want of space, I can't tell you how much the life and teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ changed the world order for better, maybe some other time. Also, miracles happen in the name of Jesus Christ, I mean verified and confirmed by third party, but we leave that for another time.
Udo diri gi

PURPORTED DECLARATION OF MAZI CHIKA EDOZIEM AS A WANTED PERSON BY THE NIGERIAN DEFENCE HEADQUARTERS:

I have been inundated with calls and messages from well meaning Biafrans and individuals, expressing their concerns following the purported declaration of Mazi Chika Edoziem- the Head of the Directorate of State of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), as a wanted person by the Nigerian Defence Headquarters.

The Indigenous People of Biafra which I am its Lead Counsel, has remained a peaceful global movement, recognised and registered in several countries across the globe; exercising their legitimate rights to self determination which is a right guaranteed under the Nigerian Constitution and other international laws and statutes.

Nigerian security agencies are not under any form of illusion about the identity of the chief mastermind of the heinous criminal activities in our land and their foot soldiers. IPOB and my humble self spent months and years shouting on top of our voices vide various publications on the devastating activities of these criminals on our land, and the deliberate attribution of their heinous criminal activities to IPOB. The reason for this deliberate attribution of the criminal, murderous and evil activities of Simon Ekpa's led criminal gangs to the IPOB peaceful global movement, is the consequences of today’s declaration.

Those who are in a position to continue making this clarification and denouncing the monstrous activities of Ekpa and his gangs, by also distancing them from peaceful activities of IPOB, but deliberately chose to shirk this compelling responsibility for reasons best known to them, are now faced with the terrible consequences of their secret romance with Ekpa.

I wish to assure all ezigbo UmuChineke and Biafrans that there is absolutely no cause for alarm. I believe in the rule of law, and be assured that the legality or otherwise of this misguided pronouncement shall be tested in a law court, because I see no justification whatsoever for such pronouncement as it concerns Mazi Chika Edoziem.

I urge all ezigbo UmuChineke to remain peaceful and law abiding as they have always been.
Justice must certainly prevail in the end.

We move!
Signed

Sir Barr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor, Esq. (KSC)
IPOB’s Lead Counsel
24th March, 2024.