Tesco Extra Sungai Dua Pulau Pinang - - Mall Tenants

High Court ruling on EPF account mergers: A cautionary tale for families
The case reveals potential pitfalls in the administration of EPF accounts, highlighting the importance for families to establish the intentions of contributors

16 Jul 2024

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

By UK Menon

For many people, the savings in an Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) account may be the only savings or legacy left them.

The EPF serves as a critical savings system designed to help a large section of the population build personal savings for their retirement years. By compelling regular contributions from both employees and employers, the EPF ensures that individuals have a financial cushion in their old age.

Beyond its role in securing retirement, the EPF also acts as a legacy tool, allowing contributors to pass on their accumulated savings to their families, thereby providing financial stability and support to their loved ones after their passing.

This dual purpose marks the importance of the EPF in fostering long-term financial security and intergenerational wealth transfer.

Support the struggle to build a Malaysia based on Justice, Freedom, Solidarity:
Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB a/c 8004240948
Make a pledge or schedule an auto donation to Aliran every month or every quarter
Become an Aliran member
Tel: 04-658 5251 email: [email protected]
The recent decision of the High Court in Shah Alam in Divyyaa Machap v Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja reveals how public expectations of the fund can be undermined by the interpretation of laws governing the distribution of funds in a deceased contributor’s account.

This unprecedented case involved a contributor who had two EPF accounts. How this happened is not explained in the judgment, but it appears that the first account was created with the contributor’s old identity card, and the second account with his new identity card.

While the first Account had no funds in it, it did have a nominated beneficiary. The second account contained funds but had no nominated beneficiary.

The two accounts may not have caused any problem to a subsequent claimant to the funds. The beneficiary to the first account would have found no funds in the first account whilst claims to the funds in the second account would have been determined by the laws relating to the distribution of the estate of deceased persons, including the Probate and Administration Act 1959.

However, as the court found, the situation became complicated when the EPF merged these two accounts into a single account. In the process, the second account was subsumed into the first account.

The EPF’s action effectively deleted or erased the second Account, leaving the contributor with only the first account. The effect of the merger was that the account with a nominated beneficiary but which had no funds, now had all the funds of the contributor.

The merger led to competing claims to the contributor’s funds upon the contributor’s death – between the named beneficiary to the first account and the contributor’s daughter, who was the administrator of the contributor’s estate.

The daughter/administrator challenged the EPF’s decision to merge her father’s accounts and its subsequent decision to regard the beneficiary of the first account as the beneficiary of the merged account.

The court ruled in favour of the EPF. It decided that while the law did not provide the EPF with the power to merge accounts, there were no provisions within the act, regulations or rules that explicitly prohibited such action.

Consequently, the court concluded that the EPF was entitled to exercise its administrative powers to merge the contributor’s accounts.

The court acknowledged that its decision would have a devastating impact on the plaintiff, but it emphasised that the EPF’s role was to perform its duties as mandated by statute, without any vested interest in the outcome.

The court also noted that while the contributor had not nominated a beneficiary for the merged account, he had not cancelled the beneficiary nominated for the first account.

With respect, the decision of the court is not entirely satisfactory. While it may in some circumstances be reasonable to imply that the EPF had power to merge accounts as an administrative action, doing so without placing on the EPF a corresponding obligation to inform the account holder about the implications of the merger is clearly unjust.

At the very least, the EPF should have requested confirmation from the account holder if he wished to maintain the nominated beneficiary in the merged account.

If the EPF was unable for any reason to determine the contributor’s intention, it should not have merged the two accounts which they had obviously approved at the time they were created.

The EPF could have assumed from the circumstances that the account holder felt no need to change or cancel the beneficiary he nominated to the first account as there were no funds in that account and that he did not nominate a beneficiary to the second account because he intended the funds in that account to devolve according to the Probate and Administration Act 1959.

Contributors may have not have named a beneficiary precisely because they intended their savings to be distributed in accordance with laws governing the distribution of estates and not to a single beneficiary. It would therefore be wrong to attribute to the contributor any blame for the events that led to the case.

The case reveals potential pitfalls in the administration of EPF accounts, highlighting the importance for families to establish the intentions of contributors, especially principal breadwinners of the family, regarding the distribution of their EPF savings while the contributor is still alive. However, these are sensitive matters which most families would be reluctant to broach.

Hence, it must fall on the EPF to show greater engagement with contributors when they make crucial changes to their accounts and not claim the changes were made as an administrative right. They must also be engaged to a greater degree in educating the public on the complexities of how the fund is managed through media, trade unions and employees’ associations.

If an individual is entitled only to a single account, that information must be reiterated to the public, whether it is law, policy or simply an administrative convenience.

UK Menon is a lawyer who left practice to teach law, and then combined law with education and developed an expertise in law and education. He finds politics to be unduly interfering in education, using law as an instrument for that interference, and feels that a better knowledge of those laws will help minimise that interference.

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

High Court ruling on EPF account mergers: A cautionary tale for families - Aliran The case reveals potential pitfalls in the administration of EPF accounts, highlighting the importance for families to establish the intentions of contributors.

Take advantage of this tax relief.

Connect with us for details.

Alice Chieng
Group Agency Manager
0127271417

Majikan, tahukah anda?

Apabila anda sebagai majikan mencarum PRS bagi pihak pekerja, anda boleh menikmati pelepasan cukai sehingga 7% di atas kadar statutori untuk sumbangan yang dibuat. Kini, anda boleh tingkatkan kesejahteraan kewangan pekerja sambil memaksimumkan penjimatan
cukai ! 😃

Jangan lepaskan peluang ini untuk memilih langkah kewangan yang bijak

Join Public Mutual as a Unit Trust Consultant and you have started your own freelance business in the multibillion $$ unit trust investment industry.

Stop being employed if you can; own a business and leverage on others.

Alice Chieng
Group Agency Manager
012-7271417

Jack Ma the richest man in China said, "If you put the Banana and Money infront of a monkey. The monkey will choose Banana because the monkey don't know that money can buy alot of Bananas."
In fact, if you offer WORK and BUSINESS to people, they will choose to WORK because most people don't know that a BUSINESS can make more money than salary.
One of the reason the poor are poor is because the poor are not trained to recognise the entrepreneurial opportunity.
They spend alot of time in school and what they learn in school is work for a salary instead of working for themselves.
Profit is better than wages because wages can support you, but profits can make you a fortune.
Keep following

Public Mutual declares distributions of over RM107m for five funds

KUALA LUMPUR (June 28): Public Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Public Mutual, has declared distributions of more than RM107 million for five funds for the financial year ended June 30, 2024.

The unit trust company, in a statement, said the gross distributions declared are 5.00 sen per unit for both the PB Fixed Income Fund and PB Islamic Fund, 4.75 sen per unit for the PB Infrastructure Bond Fund and 1.00 sen per unit for the Public Institutional Bond Fund.

It also declared 0.10 sen per unit for the Public Islamic Savings Fund (distribution policy/semi-annual).

Public Mutual is Malaysia’s largest private unit trust company with more than 180 funds under its management.

It is also an approved private retirement scheme (PRS) provider, managing nine PRS funds, with a total of 31 branches/customer service centres nationwide.

Level 3, Menara KLK, 1 Jalan PJU 7/6, Mutiara Damansara, 47810 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Public Mutual declares distributions of over RM107m for five funds Public Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Public Mutual, has declared distributions of more than RM107 million for five funds for the financial year ended June 30, 2024.

Investors are advised to avoid supposed investment schemes with "too good to be true" points. Here are some common signs of illegal schemes of which to be aware and avoid.

For UTS and PRS, always check if your Consultant is authorised at FIMM's website. Consultants can be searched using their name (including partially), IC number or FIMM number by visiting to https://www.fimm.com.my/search

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202405/31/WS665931c0a31082fc043ca30d.html

Charting 50 years of China-Malaysia ties China and Malaysia have held a strong friendship since the establishment of their diplomatic ties half a century ago. This graphic offers a detailed look at the friendship.

Super good news...

Google to invest RM9.4b in Malaysia to set up data centre and cloud region KUALA LUMPUR, May 30 — Global tech firm Google will be investing RM9.4 billion in Malaysia to house its first data centre and Google Cloud region, Investment, Trade and Industry...

Super good news for Penangites.

SPIL initiates construction of RM6 billion P1 plant in Penang | Communications Today Semiconductor packaging and testing company Siliconware Precision Industries Co Ltd (SPIL) broke ground on its RM6 billion P1 plant to be built on eight hectares in Bandar Cassia Technology Park, Penang. The plant is projected to create nearly 3,000 skilled jobs, introduce advanced packaging and tes...

Good advice.
Practise them makes life beautiful.

SOME SOCIAL RULES THAT MAY HELP YOU:

1. Don’t call someone more than twice continuously. If they don’t pick up your call, presume they have something important to attend to.

2. Return money that you have borrowed even before the person who loaned it to you remembers or asks for it. It shows your integrity and character. The same goes for umbrellas, pens, and lunch boxes.

3. Never order the expensive dish on the menu when someone is treating you to lunch or dinner.

4. Don’t ask awkward questions like ‘Oh, so you aren’t married yet?’ Or ‘Don’t you have kids?’ Or ‘Why haven't you bought a house?’ Or ‘Why haven't you bought a car?’ For God’s sake, it isn’t your problem.

5. Always open the door for the person coming behind you. It doesn’t matter if it is a guy or a girl, senior or junior. You don’t grow small by treating someone well in public.

6. If you take a taxi with a friend and he/she pays now, try paying next time.

7. Respect different shades of opinions. Remember, what may seem like 6 to you might appear as 9 to someone else. Besides, a second opinion is good for an alternative.

8. Never interrupt people while they are talking. Allow them to pour it out. As they say, hear them all and filter them all.

9. If you tease someone, and they don’t seem to enjoy it, stop it and never do it again. It encourages one to do more and shows how appreciative you are.

10. Say “thank you” when someone is helping you.

11. Praise publicly. Criticize privately.

12. There’s almost never a reason to comment on someone’s weight. Just say, “You look fantastic.” If they want to talk about losing weight, they will.

13. When someone shows you a photo on their phone, don’t swipe left or right. You never know what’s next.

14. If a colleague tells you they have a doctor's appointment, don’t ask what it’s for, just say "I hope you’re okay." Don’t put them in the uncomfortable position of having to tell you their personal illness. If they want you to know, they'll do so without your inquisitiveness.

15. Treat the cleaner with the same respect as the CEO. Nobody is impressed by how rudely you treat someone below you, but people will notice if you treat them with respect.

16. If a person is speaking directly to you, staring at your phone is rude.

17. Never give advice until you’re asked.

18. When meeting someone after a long time, unless they want to talk about it, don’t ask them their age or salary.

19. Mind your business unless anything involves you directly - just stay out of it.

20. Remove your sunglasses if you are talking to anyone in the street. It is a sign of respect. Moreover, eye contact is as important as your speech.

21. Never talk about your riches in the midst of the poor. Similarly, don't talk about your children in the midst of the barren.

22. After reading a good message, consider saying "Thanks for the message."

APPRECIATION remains the easiest way of getting what you don't have.