John Alcock - Auckland Mayoral Observer
We will now be watching Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown very carefully to ensure his actions meet his words. No to Three Waters. No to Unelected Decision Makers.
John Alcock, BSc, MSc, LLB
I stand for decentralisation and limitation of authority and power, including my own. My Principles are:
1) Everyone is their own property;
2) The fruits of your labour are your property;
3) You may do anything you like with your own property, as long as it does not damage the property of another;
4) If you damage the property of another, you must compensate them to the
John Alcock - Auckland Mayoral Observer updated their information in their About section.
No social licence for slow speeds A large pothole on a main road has damaged tyres on multiple vehicles: New Zealand’s bad road conditions have struck again after a massive pothole in the Bay of Plenty caused carnage for driv…
First on the list =P
As it should be haha =)
Haha Geoff Upson =P
You had one job 🙄🙄🙄
If it is not already abundantly clear to literally everyone, anything run by the government is doomed to failure.
Public Education was the experiment.
It is now time to take back control of the education of your children and grandchildren. End the failure of government run indoctrination camps and give your kids the best chance for their futures.
Govt will be pushing ahead with new NCEA tests despite poor trial result The Government will be pushing ahead with new NCEA literacy and numeracy tests despite a trial which saw one school have a zero percent pass rate. The tes
The Atlas Society on Instagram: "B-b-b-ut That Wasn't *Real* Socialism, Right? #SocialismSucks #AynRand" The Atlas Society shared a post on Instagram: "B-b-b-ut That Wasn't *Real* Socialism, Right? ". Follow their account to see 7628 posts.
In addition to this comment, we should also hold our representatives to the highest standard of truth. Lies have become too easy to tell with outrageous promises designed to bring e the population into voting a specific way with 0 intention of being willing or able to follow through with said promises.
It is far too easy to throw theoretical money around about the place with no regard for the intergenerational impact that this will have.
Well, let's see how this goes!
Firefighters strike action called off after Government minister brought in Internal Affairs Minister Jan Tinetti has been brought in to help settle the firefighters strike, which has been paused as mediation resumes.
💯
1) Everyone is their own property;
2) The fruits of your labour are your property;
3) You may do anything you like with your own property, as long as it does not damage the property of another;
4) If you damage the property of another, you must compensate them to the value of that damage;
5) Rules as Intended, not Rules as Written.
I will not promise you this thing or that thing related to your own special interest. That is up to you. The only thing I will promise, is that any government structure I am a part of will leave your property (which includes you as an individual) alone, unless you damage the property of another, in which case, compensation is due.
It is time to extricate local and central governments from the market entirely.
Check out Dr. Stephen Hick's course on Capitalism to learn more... https://bit.ly/3zmaIWV
There is no such thing as perfection. All we can do, is to do better than we did last time.
Plain and simple, our roading authorities are not doing their jobs. If any private organization failed this miserably at their primary task, no one would hesitate in taking their business elsewhere. Unfortunately, as these authorities have a necessary monopoly on roading, were stuck with them, but that does not mean we should tolerate incompetence.
AT need a massive shake up. It is unbelievable that they let our roads that we pay for get like this.
Happy to consider more cycle lanes, when cyclists are happy to pay for them.
Court review sought on harbour bridge cycle lanes Cycle group seeks legal review of Waka Kotahi's decision not to trial cycle lanes.
Speed and reliability always has been the key.
All of us have limited lifespans, none of which we want to waste on slow unreliable travel to get to our important events.
Heather du Plessis Allan: Aucklanders want more frequent public transport not more cycleways Have I got my hands on something good for you. Now, you know how we're constantly told by the authorities that there's all this public support for cycleway
Great catching up with my friend and meeting all the other FireFighters at the Papakua station today!
We had at least 30 to 40 people coming along to support our Fire Service and 95% of cars passing us by were tooting in support.
The public knows and understands the importance of a properly supported NZ Fire Service, even if our government would prefer to leave them underpaid, overworked and undervalued.
I heard stories from all the firefighters there today about their aging equipment, which is occasionally replaced with untested and unproved, arbitrarily purchased equipment which they are then expected to test on the job and if it fails it fails ... and then I guess you die ... obviously a great thing to see from the countries most 'kind and compassionate' government ever ... that would be funny if it weren't so depressing...
I can only hope that instead of continuous spending on additional bureaucrats with ever increasing salaries, the Labour government sees the error of their ways and re-allocates just a small portion of their incredible budget blow out towards the people who actually do the work on the frontlines and may, one day, save you, your family, your business, your community or your home...
Rain, Hail, or Shine, they'll save you, so the least we can do is support them!
I stand with the Emergency Services of New Zealand.
1) You are your own property,
2) The fruits of your labour are your property,
3) You may do anything you like with your own property, as long as it does not damage the property of another,
4) If you damage the property of another, you must compensate them to the value of that damage,
5) Rules as Intended, Not Rules as Written.
As you are not the property of the government, the government should remain utterly silent with respect to your own individual medical decisions.
Auckland Council is out of touch.
Well that article title is certainly burying the lead ...
Let me elucidate this for you:
Inflation - 7.3%
Wages & Salaries - 8.8% 😊 1.5% increase)
Government transfers - 8.3% (1% increase)
Self-Employed - 0% (-7.3% decrease)
CPI (cost of living) - Highest since 1990...
Labour are purposefully trying to obliterate the middle class, and force the entire lower class into objective slavery working for them as the owners of all the capital. They are purposefully using the force of government to transfer the entire collective wealth of middle and lower NZ to them and their cronies. They inflate away the value of your labour, transferring the wealth to the asset owning class (them, as they steal all the assets (3 Waters etc.).
Collectivism is a lie sold to you as 'kind and compassionate'.
In reality, it is theft ...
Weekly earnings jump in biggest leap since records began A key measure of Kiwi wages and salaries has shot up by its largest margin since records started 24 years ago. Stats NZ data released today showed median w
If it is not immediately obvious already, these collectivist ideologues have no interest in facilitating your lives and your choices. They are hell bent on absolutely and total domination and control of your lives in every aspect - where you can go, when you can go there, how you can go there and what you can get when you get there...
As Morty said, "That just sounds like slavery with extra steps..."
Enough of this already.
If you want your government to serve you, rather than slave you, then it's high time for a change and the change starts here.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/aucklanders-expected-to-halve-their-car-use-to-meet-carbon-emissions-target/36YHAP6MP2627PNWAUNH452Y7I/ #
Aucklanders expected to halve their car use to meet carbon emissions target Phil Goff's $1b climate tax will go some way to reducing emissions, but more is needed.
I Agree Simeon Brown MP!
Friday 19th August 11.00am – 12.00pm
All NZPFU Career Firefighters, Dispatchers, Trainers, Fire Investigators and others will walk off the job on an unprecedented full strike.
Management have stated publicly that there are contingencies in place but refuse to provide any detail on this.
Perhaps because privately they have stated they don’t believe the strike will go ahead.
FENZ management are gambling everyone’s safety on a blinking contest.
What this means for you…
Career firefighters throughout New Zealand will not respond to ANY incident.
FENZ 111 dispatchers will not answer phone calls.
We will not be providing a response to house fires, high rise building fires, Commercial building fires, Motor Vehicle accidents, Entrapments, Medical Events, Hazardous Materials incidents, Animal rescues, or any of the multitude of jobs we are called upon to do daily throughout the country.
Despite more than a year trying to get a new contract with a meaningful payrise, guaranteed access to psychological support services, guarantees of improvement in fleet and equipment, safe systems of work, recognition of workplace cancer and more, there is absolutely no movement from our employer. We are also seeking a return to realistic recruiting so that we aren’t working 60 to 100 hours a week due to staff shortages.
This is about so much more than remuneration and the details can be found at www.firecrisis.nz
This action is unprecedented in New Zealand history. It is not action we take lightly but highlights the level of frustration not only for not being able to provide for ourselves, but to be able to supply a quality emergency service to you, the public. One that you deserve. That you already pay for.
People often ask what they can do to help.
Now is your chance.
Show Fire and Emergency NZ, Jan Tinetti MP and the government in general that you believe in, and deserve a world class first response service.
Stand with us, at your nearest career fire station throughout the country.
11.00am Friday. A sad day in New Zealand history.
This is peaceful. This is respectful. But this is on!
Please take care, stay safe.
Jordan Peterson in the Telegraph - 15-08-2022
An absolute must Read / Watch.
I 100% Agree and support Dr Peterson's assessment of the situation and could not have worded it better myself, so I'll quote him here for everyone to read/watch and share!
"Leave us alone, to prosper or not, as a result of our own choices; as a result of our own actions; in the exercise of our own requisite and irreducible responsibility." - Dr Jordan Peterson
Full Free link to the Youtube Video of the article - text below:
https://youtu.be/--QS_UyW2SY
"Peddlers of environmental doom have shown their true totalitarian colours
Corporations and utopians are offering authoritarian solutions to crises only democracy and free markets can solve
Deloitte is the largest “professional services network” in the world. Headquartered in London, it is also one of the big four global accounting companies, offering audit, consulting, risk advisory, tax and legal services to corporate clients.
With a third of a million professionals operating on those fronts worldwide, and as the third-largest privately owned company in the US, Deloitte is a behemoth with numerous and far-reaching tentacles.
In short: it is an entity we should all know about, not least because such enterprises no longer limit themselves to their proper bailiwick (profit-centred business strategising, say), but – consciously or not – have assumed the role as councillors to believers in unchecked globalisation whose policies have sparked considerable unrest around the world.
If you’re seeking the cause of the Dutch agriculture and fisheries protests, the Canadian trucker convoy, the yellow-jackets in France, the farmer rebellion in India a few years ago, the recent catastrophic collapse of Sri Lanka, or the energy crisis in Europe and Australia, you can instruct yourself by the recent pronouncements from Deloitte.
Whilst not directly responsible, they offer an insight into the elite groupthink that has triggered these events; into the cabal of utopians operating in the media, corporate and government fronts, wielding a nightmarish vision of environmental apocalypse.
Outlandish claims
In May this year, Deloitte released a clarion call to precipitous action trumpeting the climate emergency confronting us. Called ‘The Turning Point: A Global Summary’, it is a stellar example of a mentality more common among officials in the EU: one of fundamental bureaucratic overreach (and one which generated Brexit – a very good decision on the part of the Brits, in my view) that threatens the very survival of that selfsame EU.
The report opens with two claims: first, that the storms, wildfires, droughts, downpours, and floods around the globe in the last 18 months are unique and unprecedented – a dubious claim – and implicitly that the “science” is now at a point where we can say without doubt that experts can and must model the entire ecology and economy of the planet (!) and that we must modify everyone’s behaviour, by hook or by crook, to avoid what would otherwise be the most expensive environmental and social catastrophe in history.
The Deloitte “models” posit that “climate impacts” could affect global economic output, and say that unchecked climate change will cost us $178 trillion over the next 50 years – that’s $25,000 per person, to put it in human terms.
Who dares deny such facts, stated so mathematically? So precisely? So scientifically?
Let’s update Mark Twain’s famous dictum: there are lies, damned lies, statistics – and computer models.
“Computer model” does not mean “data” (and even “data” does not mean “fact”). “Computer model” means, at best, “hypothesis” posing as mathematical fact.
No real scientist says “follow the science.” Yet this is exactly what bodies such as the EU consistently pronounce, pushing for collectivist solutions that do more harm than good.
Solutions in sovereignty
What might we rely on, instead, to guide us forward, in these times of accelerating trouble and possibility?
Valid authority rests in the people. Truly valid structures of authority are local, not centralised for reasons of efficiency and “emergency”. This must not become the generation of yet another top-down Tower of Babel. That will not solve our problems, just as similar attempts have failed to solve our problems in the past.
Ask yourself: are these Deloitte models – which are supposed to guide all the important decisions we make about the economic security and opportunity of families and the structures of our civil societies – accurate enough even to give those who employ them any edge whatsoever, say, in predicting the performance of a stock portfolio (one based on green energy, for example) over the upcoming years?
The answer is no. How do we know? Because if such accurate models existed and were implemented by a company with Deloitte’s resources and reach, Deloitte would soon have all the money.
That is never going to happen. The global economy, let alone the environment, is simply too complex to model. It is for this reason, fundamentally, that we have and require a free-market system: the free market is the best model of the environment we can generate.
Let me repeat that, with a codicil: not only is the free market the best model of the environment we can generate, it is and will remain the best model that can, in principle, ever be generated (with its widely distributed computations, constituting the totality of the choices of 7 billion people). It simply cannot be improved upon – certainly not by presumptuous power-mad utopians, who think that hiring someone mysteriously manipulating a few carefully chosen numbers and then reading the summarised output means genuine contact with the reality of the future and the generation of knowledge unassailable on both the ethical and the practical front.
The impact of delusional thinking
Why is this a problem? Why should you care? Well, the saviours at Deloitte admit that there will be a short-term cost to implementing their cure (net-zero emissions by 2050, an utterly preposterous and inexcusable goal, both practically and conceptually). This, by the way, is a goal identical to that adopted last week by the delusional leaders of Australia, which additionally committed that resource-dependent-and-productive country to an over 40 per cent decrease by 2005 standards in "greenhouse gas emission" within the impossible timeframe of eight years. This will devastate Australia.
Here is the confession, couched in bureaucratic double-speak, from the Deloitte consultants: "During the initial stages the combined cost of the upfront investments in decarbonization, coupled with the already locked-in damages of climate change would temporarily lower economic activity, compared to the current emissions-intensive path.”
The omniscient planners then attempt to justify this, with the standard empty threats and promises (the suffering is certain, the benefits ethereal): “those most exposed to the economic damages of unchecked climate change would also have the most to gain from embracing a low-emissions future.” Really? Tell that to the African and Indian populations in the developing world lifted from poverty by coal and natural gas.
And think – really think – about this statement: “Existing industries would be reconstituted as a series of complex, interconnected, emissions-free energy systems: energy, mobility, industry, manufacturing, food and land use, and negative emissions.”
That sounds difficult, don’t you think? To rebuild everything at once and better? Without breaking everything? Fixing everything in a few decades in a panicked rush while demonising anyone who dares object?
And what will it take to do so? Here’s the most alarming part: nothing more than “a coordinated transition” that “will require governments, along with the financial services and technology sectors to catalyze, facilitate and accelerate progress; foster information flows across systems; and align individual incentives with collective goals.”
A clearer statement of totalitarian inclination could hardly be penned.
Certain outcomes versus predicted outcomes
The one thing the Deloitte models guarantee is that if we do what they recommend we will definitely be poorer than we would have been otherwise for an indefinite but hypothetically transitory period.
Yet any reduction in economic output (however “temporary” and “necessary”) will be purchased at the cost of the lives of those who are barely making it now. Period.
Have you noticed that food has become more expensive? That housing has become more expensive? That energy is more expensive? That many consumer goods are simply unavailable? Can you not see that this is going to get worse, if the Deloitte-style moralists have their way? How much “short-term pain” are you going to be required to sustain? Decades worth? All your life, and the life of your children?
It’s very likely. For your own benefit. Remember that.
All this painful privation is not only not going to save the planet, it’s going to make it far worse.
I worked for a UN subcommittee that helped prepare the 2012 report to the Secretary-General on sustainable development. Whether or not it was a good idea to contribute to such a thing is a separate issue: I do believe at least that the report would have been much more harmful than it was without the input of the Canadian contingent. We scrubbed away several layers of utopianism and Cold-War era conceptualisation and cynicism. That was something.
I garnered a key and crucial insight from the several years’ work devoted to my contribution: I learned that the fastest and most certain pathway forward to the future we all want and need (peaceful, prosperous, beautiful) is through the economic elevation of the absolutely poor. Richer people care about “the environment” – which is, after all,outside the primary and fundamental concern of those desperate for their next meal.
Make the poor rich, and the planet will improve. Or at least get out of their way while they try to make themselves rich. Make the poor poorer – and this is the concrete plan, remember – and things will get worse, perhaps worse beyond imagining. Observe the chaos in Sri Lanka, if you need proof.
There are clearly more important priorities than costly and ineffective emergency climate change reductions. Bjorn Lomborg’s work (among others such as Marian Tupy and Matt Ridley) has demonstrated that other pressing problems could and should take political and economic priority, from the perspective of good done per dollar spent.
Money could and should be spent, for example, to ensure the current health and therefore future productivity (and environmental stewardship) of currently poor children in developing countries. How about remedying the actual world of pain and deprivation of such children rather than saving the hypothetical world, and the hypothetical world of future children, in abstraction?
Stirrings of revolt
Citizens are waking up to this. Dutch farmers and fishermen are rising up, Canadian truckers are pushing back. Such protests are spreading, and increasing in intensity. As they should.
Why? Because, Deloitte consultants, and like-minded centralists are pushing things too far. It will not produce the results they are hypothetically intending. This agenda, justified by emergency, will instead make everyone poorer, particularly those who are already poor. This use of emergency force will, instead, make the lives of the working men upon whom we all depend for our daily bread and shelter more difficult and less rewarding.
Finally, this use of emergency force will also make the “environment” worse, not better. Why? If you wreck your temporary economic havoc, to (eventually) remediate the world, those whom you sacrifice so casually in the attempt will descend into chaos. In that chaos, they will then, by necessity, turn their attention to matters of immediate survival – and in a manner that will stress and harm the complex ecosystems and economies that can only be maintained with the long-term view that prosperity and nothing else makes possible.
Critics of my view will say “we have to accept limits to growth.” Fine. Accept them. Personally. Abandon your position of planet-devouring wealthy privilege. Join an ascetic order. Graze with the cattle. Or, if that’s too much (and it probably is) then purchase an electric car, if you want one (but no diesel-powered emergency backup vehicle or electric power generator for you). Buy some stock in Tesla. That’s probably the best bet (but you don’t approve of Elon Musk, do you?). Stop flying. Stop driving, for that matter. Get on your bike, instead. In your three-piece business suit. In the winter, if you dare. I’ll splash you with icy and salty slush as I drive by, in my evil but warm Ford Bronco SUV, and help you derive the consequent delicate pleasure of your own narcissistic martyrdom.
Save the planet with your own choices. But quit demanding that the rest of us blindly follow your diktats. Quit demonising and castigating us, merely because we don’t just happily cede to you all the extant power. We’re not evil just because we don’t believe that you are omniscient. We’re not evil just because we don’t want you to assume omnipotence and omnipresence too.
There is simply no pathway forward to the green and equitable utopia that necessitates the further impoverishment of the already poor, the compulsion of the working class, or the sacrifice of economic security and opportunity on the food, energy and housing front. There is simply no pathway forward to the global utopia you hypothetically value that is dependent on force. And even if there was, what gives you the right to enforce your demands? On other sovereign citizens, equal in value to you?
An alternative solution
A better way forward would be to prioritise the problems that beset all of us on this still-green, functional and increasingly abundant planet with the requisite focus and attention demanded of a true political class, elected by the people, capable of and willing to look at everything, trying to fix where necessary, trying to maintain as much freedom and autonomy as possible, and stop simply capitalising narcissistically on the mere appearance of action, knowledge and virtue.
We should obtain true, cooperative consent from those affected – farmers, truckers, working-class people who have turned in irritated desperation to figures such as Donald Trump – and work with them, rather than forbidding them with your power or improving them so they will be finally worthy of your time and attention. Help replace dirty energy with clean, if you must, but do it on your own dime, and make sure that the results are cheap and plentiful, if you want to help the poor, and the planet.
The warning bells are ringing. Listen to them, before they turn into sirens.
We will not advance without resistance through the straits of your enforced privation. We will not allow you to steal and destroy the energy that makes our lives bearable (and that produces our food and shelter and housing and the sporadic delights of modern life) just to address your existential terror (particularly when it will fail to do so in any case). We will not allow our children to be criticised first for having the temerity to merely exist and then be deprived of the prosperous and opportunity-rich future we strived so hard to prepare for them. We remain unconvinced of your frightened and self-congratulatory moralising and intellectual pretension, ignorance of the limits of statistics, and misuse of arithmetic.
We do not believe, finally and most absolutely, that your declared emergency and the panic you sow because of it means that you should now be ceded all necessary authority.
So leave us alone, you centralisers; you worshippers of Gaia; you sacrificers of the wealth and property of others; you would-be planetary saviours; you Machievellian pretenders and virtue-signallers, objecting to power, all the while you gather it around you madly.
Leave us alone, to prosper or not, as a result of our own choices; as a result of our own actions; in the exercise of our own requisite and irreducible responsibility.
Leave us alone. Or reap the whirlwind. And watch the terrible destruction of what you purport to save, in consequence."
- Dr Jordan Peterson - The Telegraph 15-08-2022
Article: Back Off, Oh Masters of the Universe Article: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/08/15/peddlers-environmental-doom-have-shown-true-totalitarian-colours/Globalist utopians demand that we fall ...
Click here to claim your Sponsored Listing.
Videos (show all)
Category
Contact the public figure
Website
Address
Auckland
1010
Avondale
Auckland
Help me make the Whau the most accessible, inclusive, and environmentally-friendly part of Aotearoa!
Cornwall Park
Auckland
I have lived next to Cornwall Park for 35 Years and I am a C&R Albert-Eden candidate for the 2022 October Local Board Elections. https://www.facebook.com/AlbertEdenPuketapapa
Halfmoon Bay
Auckland, 2012
Authorised by KhalydBaloch of Waller Ave Bucklands Brach East Auckland 2012 Self Motivated & Passi
Suite 2. 5 Gillies Avenue, Newmarket
Auckland, 1023
Hello Tukituki. I am your ACT Party candidate. Together we can ACT and change the future. Party vote
81 Finlayson Avenue, Manurewa
Auckland, 2103
MP for Tāmaki Makaurau Te Pāti Māori 🖤🤍❤️ Authorised by Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp
Auckland
The official page for Viv Beck. Authorised by Anthony McGivern, 245 Sandringham Road, Auckland, NZ.
Māngere
Auckland, 2024
Local resident of Māngere-Ōtāhuhu running as a first time candidate in the local body elections.
Suite 2. 5, 27 Gillies Avenue
Auckland, 1023
ACT 2020 Candidate for Hamilton East. Authorised by D Smith, Suite 2.5, 27 Gillies Avenue, Newmarket