LV Traffic Ticket Guy

Understanding Nevada's Roadblock Rules: A Driver's Guide

This blog post dives into the legalese of Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) to explain the rules surrounding administrative and temporary roadblocks set up by law enforcement. We'll break down the legalese into clear terms for drivers to understand their rights and responsibilities during these encounters.

What are Administrative and Temporary Roadblocks?

Administrative Roadblock: Defined as any measure taken by police to control traffic at a specific location for a lawful purpose other than checking vehicle occupants or responding to an emergency. This could involve DUI checkpoints, license and registration checks, or collecting data for traffic studies.

Temporary Roadblock: Established for specific reasons like apprehending wanted individuals or controlling traffic near an accident scene or potential hazard.

What are the Requirements for Each Type of Roadblock?

Administrative Roadblock:

Clearly visible from at least 100 yards in both directions.
Marked entrance with a large, illuminated "Stop" sign and a flashing red light.
Warning signs with the words "police stop ahead" placed at least:
¼ mile away in rural areas.
700 feet away in urban areas.
Illuminated with bright lights to attract attention.
Temporary Roadblock:

Visible from at least 100 yards in both directions.
Marked entrance with a clearly marked emergency vehicle with flashing lights.
Cones, flares, or similar markers to channel traffic and warn of the roadblock at least 100 yards before entry.
Additional markers 200-400 yards before the roadblock to warn of potential hazards.
Important Points for Drivers:

It's illegal to proceed through either type of roadblock without following police instructions.
Obey all directions from officers at the roadblock.
Penalties for failing to stop at a roadblock can range from a gross misdemeanor to a category B felony depending on the severity of the outcome.
These provisions don't limit the authority of police officers for regular traffic control measures.
Additional Notes:

A separate statute (NRS 484B.574) deals with situations where drivers ignore roadblocks due to flooding and potentially face liability for emergency response costs.
Provisions are included for situations where drivers make a good faith effort to assist someone in danger during flooding.
Remember:

Knowing these rules can help ensure a smooth interaction with law enforcement during roadblocks.
If you're unsure about anything, politely ask the officer for clarification.
Always prioritize safety and follow instructions from officers at the scene.
Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and shouldn't be considered legal advice. If you have concerns about specific situations, consult with a lawyer.

School Zones vs. School Crossing Zones in Nevada: Understanding the Difference

Nevada traffic laws differentiate between two areas of heightened caution for drivers: school zones and school crossing zones. While both areas require extra vigilance near schools, the key distinction lies in their location relative to school property.

School Zones (NRS 484B.063):

Defined as sections of streets adjacent to school property.
This encompasses areas bordering the school grounds, likely including sidewalks and streets directly in front of the school.
Increased driver awareness is crucial in these zones due to the presence of children entering or exiting school grounds.

School Crossing Zones (NRS 484B.060):

Defined as sections of streets not adjacent to school property that pupils use while following designated walking routes.
This likely applies to crosswalks situated away from the school itself, along the designated walking paths used by students.
Extra caution is required from drivers as children may be crossing at these designated points, even if not directly in front of the school building.

Remember: Whenever you see signage indicating a school zone or school crossing zone, slow down, be extra vigilant for children on foot, and yield the right of way as necessary. Following these guidelines helps ensure the safety of students on their way to and from school.

Great day in court today! Successfully argued dismissals for all four clients facing civil traffic infractions. I'm proud to continue my record of strong advocacy for my clients in these matters. ⚖️

Got a traffic ticket? LV Traffic Ticket Guy can help!

Another school zone ticket was dismissed today in court, with my help, because the Clark County School District Police Department officers are poorly trained and don't know how to write tickets.

Justice in Limbo: Fight for Fair Trials Against Unelected Judges in Las Vegas! ⚖️
Right here in Las Vegas, a disturbing reality hangs heavy in the air: defendants facing appointed judges with questionable biases, operating behind an invisible wall of impunity. These aren't your typical judges – they're commissioners or pro tems, handpicked and overseen by the Chief Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz, with little accountability beyond that single office.

The Shadow of Bias: These unelected judges raise serious concerns about fair trials with actions like:

- Presuming guilt and burdening defendants to prove their innocence. ⚖️
- Rewriting legal terms on the fly, creating confusion and undermining established law.
- Silencing defendants by denying motions without hearings and even misrepresenting proceedings.
- Unaccountable and Unyielding: Unlike elected judges facing the scrutiny of voters, these commissioners hold virtually unassailable positions. The Chief Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz, their sole supervisor, holds all the cards, including the power to hire, fire, and seemingly turn a blind eye to potential bias.

This is a recipe for injustice: a system where defendants face potentially biased judges with no real recourse, and a Chief Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz with unchecked power. But we, the people of Las Vegas, can change the story.

Our Voice is the Key: We cannot let our justice system be held hostage by unaccountable officials. Here's how you can make a difference:

- Share this post and raise awareness about the lack of accountability and potential bias in the Las Vegas Justice Court. Every share amplifies the call for reform and fair trials.
- Stay informed about specific cases where defendants face questionable treatment. Knowledge is power, and we need to be ready to stand up when needed.
- Contact your local representatives and demand change in the selection and oversight of judges in the Las Vegas Justice Court. Let them know that unelected judges with unchecked power are unacceptable.
- Remember Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz at the next election! Make your voice heard by holding the ultimate decision-maker accountable at the ballot box.
Together, we can raise our voices and demand a justice system that truly serves all of Las Vegas, where fair trials are not a gamble but a guarantee.



Remember, your vote, your voice, and your awareness are all powerful tools. Let's use them to ensure fair trials for everyone in Las Vegas!

Hold Your Horses, Chief Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz! Is Nevada's Phone Law Out of Control?
Is simply looking at your phone with the screen OFF illegal in Nevada? A recent decision by Traffic Commissioner David F. Brown, who serves at the pleasure of the Chief Judge, has drivers and lawyers alike scratching their heads and questioning the fairness of our traffic laws. The case is State of Nevada v. Kristina Vadamovna Figurazh, Case No. 23-CI-010814.

Here's the head-scratcher: Commissioner Brown ruled that simply glancing down at a phone, even with a blank screen, can be considered "reading data" under NRS 484B.165, the state's law prohibiting handheld devices while driving.

Whoa, whoa, whoa! Hold on just a second, Chief Judge! This interpretation seems a bit...extreme, doesn't it? Let's dig into why we're not convinced:

- Plain and simple: The law says "reading data," which implies actively accessing and understanding information on a screen. A blank screen doesn't exactly scream "data consumption."
- Lack of evidence: In the case at hand, there was no proof the phone was even in use. Are we criminalizing quick glances at inactive phones now?
-Overreach alert: Expanding the law beyond its intended scope raises serious concerns about due process. Should we all carry legal counsel in our glove compartments, just in case?
-Chilling effect on responsible drivers: This interpretation could discourage folks from even touching their phones for legitimate reasons, like adjusting a hands-free mount or checking a notification. Is that the message we want to send?

We understand distracted driving is a serious issue. But let's focus on the real dangers, not penalizing people for innocent glances at blank screens.

Chief Judge, we urge you to review this decision. Let's ensure Nevada's traffic laws are fair, clear, and focused on genuine distractions, not innocent actions.

What do YOU think? Share your thoughts on this head-scratching decision in the comments!



P.S. Want to learn more about NRS 484B.165? Check out the official Nevada Revised Statutes website: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-484b.html

Let's keep the conversation going! Share this post and help spread the word.

Remember, this post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for specific legal questions.

NRS: CHAPTER 484B - RULES OF THE ROAD 1.  Except as otherwise provided in this section, a person shall not, while operating a motor vehicle on a highway in this State:

Kafka's Court: Can You Speed Away from Unjust Traffic Tickets?
Picture this: You're slapped with a speeding ticket – not for a wild joyride, but for a supposed 21-29 MPH over the limit. The kicker? The accusation hangs limp on the word of someone claiming to be a law enforcement officer, shrouded in anonymity. You try to fight it, but the system laughs in your face, dragging you into a Kafkaesque nightmare.

A Hollow Accusation, Hollower Evidence:

The ticket hinges on a whisper – no witness, no dashcam, just an unverified claim by a faceless "officer."
You try to downgrade the infraction, a common right, but it's denied without explanation. Why? The gears of this machine don't explain themselves.
Doubts dance in the shadows: was there even a radar gun? No calibration dates, no certification documents... just more mystery swirling in the air.
Justice, Lost in Translation:

Traffic Commissioner Westmeyer, who serves at the pleasure of the Chief Justice of the Peace, Cynthia Cruz seems to rubber-stamp these unsubstantiated accusations. Is this justice, or a game of thrones, where power trumps facts?
You seek a fair hearing, but the tribunal you face scoffs at due process. No proper notice, no chance to question your invisible accuser, just a blindfolded system stumbling onwards.
Constitutional Rights, Crushed by a Broken System:

Your right to a jury trial? Vanished. Apparently, a speeding ticket doesn't deserve a judge or peers, just a one-sided pronouncement.
The Sixth Amendment, guaranteeing the right to face your accuser? A ghost in the machine. You fight a shadow, left to defend yourself against a faceless whisper.
The verdict? "Guilty," a hollow echo devoid of evidence or explanation. Is this justice, or a broken system churning out convictions based on thin air?
This isn't just about a speeding ticket. It's about a system where shadows trump substance, accusations outshine evidence, and power drowns out rights. And it's happening under the thumb of the Chief Justice of the Peace, raising even more questions about the independence and fairness of this supposed arbiter of justice.

Share this post. Raise your voice. We can't let legal labyrinths swallow justice whole. We must shine a light on these systemic cracks and fight for a fairer legal system, one where the scales of justice tip towards truth, not whispers.

My recent experience has shown an increasing number of Las Vegas Justice Court cases exceeding the expected timeframe for finalization. These unexpected delays, even affecting some cases finalized as early as 2021, warrant further investigation. With this in mind, I am advising my clients to consider communicating their concerns directly to the Commission on Judicial Discipline. I have drafted a sample letter to assist in this endeavor:

[Date]
Commission on Judicial Discipline
P.O. Box 48
Carson City, NV 89702
Re: Complaint Regarding Las Vegas Justice Court’s Failure to Finalize Traffic Cases
Dear Commissioners,
I am writing to express my serious concerns regarding the failure of the Las Vegas Justice Court, Chief Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz, to promptly finalize traffic cases with amendments and closure. This ongoing issue has resulted in significant delays and uncertainty for numerous individuals, including myself.
Specific Concerns:
• Delays in Finalization: I have personally experienced [Describe your specific experience with delays, including case numbers and dates].
• Impact on Individuals: These delays have caused [Describe the negative impacts you've experienced, such as financial hardship, license suspension, or employment issues].
• Potential Violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct: I believe these delays may constitute violations of the Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct, specifically:
o Canon 2, Rule 2.5: Competence, Diligence, and Cooperation
o Canon 2, Rule 2.6: Ensuring the Right to Be Heard
o Canon 2, Rule 2.12: Supervisory Duties
Request for Investigation and Action:
I respectfully request that the Commission initiate a thorough investigation into this matter to determine the cause of these delays and to hold those responsible accountable. I urge you to take appropriate action to ensure the prompt and efficient finalization of traffic cases, upholding the integrity of the judicial process and protecting the rights of individuals.
I am available to provide any further information or documentation that may be helpful in your investigation.
Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
Enclosures: [List any supporting documents, such as case records or correspondence]

When Justice Takes a Wrong Turn: The Dereliction of Duty and the Unlawful Courtroom Maneuvers in Traffic Ticket Cases For over a year, a concerning scene has unfolded in our courtrooms. Traffic violations, those seemingly minor bumps on the road of daily life, have become warped into a twisted landscape where fairness buckles under the weight of a dereliction of duty and the court grapples with an unlawful burden.....

New Year's Eve

The clock strikes twelve, the year is done,
A brand new one has just begun.
We raise our glasses, clink and cheer,
To joys and hopes of coming year.

We leave behind the troubles past,
The heartaches, fumbles, die-cast.
We face the future, bright and bold,
With stories yet to be told.

So let us dance and laugh and sing,
As merry bells begin to ring.
Let's make some resolutions grand,
To change the world, hand in hand.

But first, let's savor this champagne,
And toast to sunshine, toast to rain.
To dreams that sparkle, goals that gleam,
And everything that's yet to be!

Happy New Year, from me to you,
May all your wishes come true!

Got a traffic ticket? LV Traffic Ticket Guy can help!

Got a traffic ticket? LV Traffic Ticket Guy can help!

Two up, two down as they say in baseball!

My friend, old school criminal defense attorney (ret.) Dan Markoff, has a great saying: "When the facts are on your side, argue the facts. When the law is on your side, argue the law. But when neither the facts nor the law are on your side, pound your fists on the table and declare that it just isn't fair!"

I didn't have to pound my fists on the table today, but I did win one case by arguing the law and another by arguing the facts. This reminded me of my friend's advice and it was a great result for both clients!

AB116 has given Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson the excuse that he needs to ignore his duty to prosecute traffic offenses. As a result, all traffic offenses filed in the various justice courts are now prosecuted by the courts. Despite this unconstitutional and illegal practice, we managed to get two more speeding ticket cases dismissed yesterday.

This is my youngest client - ever. And also the biggest baby I've ever heard of. 🤣

Press Release July 28, 2023 Goodsprings Justice Court ends practice of assessing collection fees

Yep, we are still handling traffic ticket cases ... We just got another case dismissed today.

Today we successfully obtained another verdict in favor of our client in a contested traffic ticket case. Call us to see if you need help contesting your traffic ticket case.

Got a traffic ticket? We can help.

https://www.lvtrafficticketguy.com/

Happy Independence Day from our families to you and yours!

"the penalty for reckless driving cause substantial hodily harm or death has been increased from six years to 20 years plus an additional seven years if it is in a school zone."

More than 200 new Nevada laws go into effect on July 1 More than 200 new laws for driving offenses take effecton July 1. Here's a break down of some of the laws that will go into effect.