Equal Parenting Party

Father's Daze (2020)

This is a good new movie. It is well worth a look. It was given a 5.8 on the IMDB ratings.

Inspired by true events in 1994, Father's Daze exposes the additional pressures exerted by the UK Child Support Agency on one family dealing with the consequences of marital breakdown. Ben, a freelance wedding photographer, suddenly finds himself a single parent of three young boys.

After adapting to his new situation, Ben finds himself an innocent victim of the system and struggles through a roller coaster of emotions as he fights for his rights against an irrational, faceless organization, desperately trying to provide a home for his children against all the odds.

Following enormous public protests, the UK Child Support Agency was axed in 1996 and replaced with a revised system, which is still controversial today.

Fairness in Child Support (F.I.C.S.) will meet on Thursday 4 March 2021. The meeting will commence at 7.30 PM at the Coniston Community Hall, Coniston. Please contact John Flanagan on 0415 899 574 for further details.

Everyone is welcome.

Regards

John Flanagan,
Secretary,
Fairness In Child Support.
http://fairnessinchildsupport.blogspot.com/

Fairness In Child Support (F.I.C.S.) The Fairness In Child Support (F.I.C.S) Meetings will be re-started. They have been put on standby as a result of the Covid19  Virus issue since March 2020.

Fairness in Child Support (F.I.C.S.) will meet on Thursday 4 February 2021. The meeting will commence at 7.30 PM at the Coniston Community Hall, Coniston. Please contact John Flanagan on 0415 899 574 for further details.

Everyone is welcome.

Regards
John Flanagan,
Secretary,
Fairness In Child Support.
http://fairnessinchildsupport.blogspot.com/

Fairness In Child Support (F.I.C.S.) The Fairness In Child Support (F.I.C.S) Meetings will be re-started. They have been put on standby as a result of the Covid19  Virus issue since March 2020.

The Fathers Have Rights group is organising a rally in Sydney & also Wollongong on 26th January 2021 at 11am.

http://www.familylawexpress.com.au/family-law-brief/divorce-2/financialdispute/family-law-dispute-roadmap-the-who-what-where-of-getting-a-divorce/2409/

This article attempts to briefly explain these various Family Law Dispute stages and the role of the parties involved in each stage.

Hi to Everyone
The Fairness In Child Support (F.I.C.S) Meetings will be re-started. They have been put on standby as a result of the Covid19 Virus issue since March 2020.
The meetings will be held again on the usual monthly basis.
The next meeting will be held at the Coniston Community Hall, 26 Bridge Street, Coniston. NSW. 2500. It will start at 7.30pm on Thursday 4 February 2021 (we do not meet in January).
Everyone is Welcome.
John Flanagan
Secretary
FAIRNESSINCHILDSUPPORT.BLOGSPOT.COM
Fairness In Child Support (F.I.C.S.)

http://www.fathers4equality-australia.org/equalparenting/f4eregistration.nsf/person

Non-Custodial Parent? Help us fix family law! Sign the .. ‘Strength in Numbers’ Register..NOW! » Fathers4Equality Sign the F4E Strength in Numbers Register now! Its free and nothing is required of you, but every person who signs helps us send an even louder message to Canberra that the silent majority have numbers and we have a voice, and we intend to use it!

Hi to Everyone.

It has just been shown that the current Family Law Inquiry is a complete waste of time. This is by Kevin Andrew’s own comment to Professor Mushin that “I fully understand that, Professor” at the Family Law Inquiry.

This is an extract of the transcript at the conclusion of the proceedings held on 16 September 2020. The Chair(person) is Kevin Andrews MP. Andrews will be employing someone to write the report for him. It is a chairperson’s report. It is not a committee report. The other members of the Committee will have little input in the writing of the final report. This includes Senator Pauline Hanson.

The transcript of the proceedings states:

CHAIR: Yes, I'm struggling myself to work out what could be done. But the propensity of evidence we have had—we have to weigh it—certainly seems to suggest that there are sufficient instances in which there is noncompliance with orders for which there is little consequence. It may be that there isn't much we can do or suggest. I was just trying to tease out whether there is some way of improving the system in this regard.

Prof. Mushin: Noncompliance is something that judges agonise over. It's not as simple as, for example, where a contract is breached and a court orders, 'You will pay X dollars by Y date.' What you have in the background is a child or children, and the question of their best interests is highly relevant. For example, the primary carer of a child might be absolutely flagrantly and egregiously breaching an order to allow the child to see the other parent. One of the problems is that the primary relationship might be between the child and that primary parent. Therefore, penalising the primary parent, for example—even by jail, ultimately—can be a major penalty on the child himself or herself. As a result, you would be not observing the requirement of the child's best interests being paramount. That balance is so exquisitely difficult in enforcement proceedings.

CHAIR: I fully understand that, Professor. I thank you both for your submissions and for the discussion of them this afternoon. It has been most informative. We appreciate your expertise and your willingness to share it with the committee.

Prof. Mushin: Thank you
_______________________________________________

Bring on the next Inquiry!!

John Flanagan.

https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/commsen/58f41859-023a-4c55-90c4-4642e571cbd3/toc_pdf/Joint%20Select%20Committee%20on%20Australia's%20Family%20Law%20System_2020_09_16_8121.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf =%22committees/commsen/58f41859-023a-4c55-90c4-4642e571cbd3/0000%22

parlinfo.aph.gov.au

Mario Licha - Men's Legal Assistance.

http://www.familylawexpress.com.au/family-law-news/legal-proceedings/self-repersented-litigant/standing-up-for-themselves-self-represented-litigants/2147/

Standing up for themselves: self-represented litigants If you had to stand up and represent yourself in family court, how would you cope? It's probably something we should all be thinking about, because hiring a lawyer is expensive and legal aid budgets are under extreme stress so flying solo in court is increasingly common. This articles explores the c...

Reposted

Carol Cassar
15h •

To Politicians of Australia

I am a mother of 4 sons, and a grandmother of 11 boys. I am truly concerned what the future holds for them and the entire male population of Australia.
The underlying cause that threatens their future is the false feminist narrative and agenda and their bias domestic violence industry.
As politicians society relies on YOU to stand up and speak out against injustices and evil.
Instead the government seems to ignore and try to hide the destruction and damage modern day feminism has placed on today's society. It appears that the government is too scared to speak out against the false feminist narrative, afraid of the screams, screeches, abuse, threats and the loss of votes of the feminist population.
I hope you realise that the majority of female voters in this country are disgusted, sickened, and oppose modern day feminism, their false narrative and the suffering and heartache it causes women, men and children..

* The elimination of good Dads from children's lives.

* The high male su***de rate,

* The vilification of men,

* The false allegations and frivolous reasons claimed by women to gain dvos to better their positions in custody battles

* The protection and excuses afforded to female perpetrators.

* No repercussions for perjury in family law courts.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

We are the quite, good decent women of Australia and we are watching you, we are waiting for you to do the right thing. Our eyes are open and so are our mouths, we are coming together in force to stand up and speak out.
This was the post of another Grandmother.

Hi to Everyone

There is a child support matter being heard today (28 August 2020) in the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. This will be heard in the Federal Court building in Sydney. It concerns an appeal against a decision made in the Federal Court of Australia on 12 July 2019 by a single judge.

The matter revolves around the Australia-New Zealand Agreement and Australian child support legislation.

Unfortunately the appeal hearing is effectively a closed hearing. This is with only one person allowed to attend the hearing with the appellant. This is due to coranavirus (Covid-19) issues.

The primary decision is http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2019/1097.html

This is summarised in a recent associated decision which is http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2020/862.html

John Flanagan

Daley v Child Support Registrar [2019] FCA 1097 (12 July 2019) AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2019/1097.html

Reposted:
Rick N Leisa Young
Visual storyteller · 3h
Attention all Brisbane Dads, families.
24th August 630-830
Over pass protest.

Pm for details. Let’s make some noise and bring awareness to issues of parental alienation and the broken family court systems.
The use of false allegations, with malicious dvo to alienate fathers, for leverage in family court proceedings.

Our theme for protests are super Heros, so get ya hero on . 👊🏻

This is an interesting and high profile Relocation & Abduction case commonly referred to as the case of the 4 Italian sisters.

-------

Four girls, aged between 9 and 14, moved to Australia with their mother in 2010.

The mother got the father's consent for the trip by claiming that it was just a holiday. Since arriving she however has stated that she and the children wished to stay in Australia permanently.

Their Italian father has been embroiled in a custody battle with the Sunshine Coast-based mother since finding out that the mother deceived him as to the nature of the trip.

The girls' mother exercised a last ditch attempt to have a Family Court order the girls go back to Italy to face custody proceedings overturned.

Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services & Garning (Discharge application) [2012] FamCA 839 | Family Law Express Decisions Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services & Garning (Discharge application) [2012] FamCA 839 Categories: Child Abduction, Enforcement of Orders, Hague Convention, Relocation Tags: 4 Italian sisters, application for discharge, Australian Federal Police, child abduction, Child Ab...

https://www.familylawexpress.com.au/family-law-brief/evidence/subpoena/how-to-file-a-subpoena-for-medical-records/2370/

How to File a Subpoena For Medical Records

http://www.equalparenting.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Sub01suppsub-Non-Custodial-Parents-Party-Equal-Parenting.pdf

www.equalparenting.org.au

For information.

This is the download link for the family law inquiry proceedings held on 22 July 2020.

It is a pretty big file. It is 2.3 Gb.

With my Internet account, I have unlimited downloads. Therefore the size of the file does not worry me. However if you have limited downloads, it could be a problem.

It takes about 30 minutes to download. 1 item, 2.3 GB in total
Get your files

Download link
https://parlav.wetransfer.com/downloads/55f2c69ce09aab1ec4ff6a1d1d34197420200723004648/35235d4a377ac03cd2bf6f51da07fd1420200723004648/369537
1 item
Senate_AFLS_220720_1101-1618.mp4
2.3 GB

Senate_AFLS_220720_1101-1618.mp4 1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world

Top 10 mistakes by Fathers seeking Shared Parenting in Australia » Fathers4Equality Top 10 mistakes by Fathers seeking Shared Parenting in Australia   In 2006, the Australian government (Liberal/National Coalition) and the opposition (Labor party) unanimously passed the Shared Parental amendments to the Family Law act, which has since become internationally recognised as ground-br...

http://www.fathers4equality-australia.org/politics/custodian-parents-party-closing-help-support-fathers4equality-to-continue-the-fight/

Non-Custodial Parents Party has been deregistered! Please help Support Fathers4Equality to continue the fight » Fathers4Equality Non-Custodial Parents Party has been deregistered! Please help Support Fathers4Equality to continue the fight  Advocacy, Donate, Politics Jun 042020   YOU may have heard recently that Australia’s first and only political party supporting men and non-custodial parents has been de-registered. This...

https://www.spectator.com.au/2020/06/mounting-anger-around-the-family-law-inquiry/?fbclid=IwAR3XBdJYm6zQAnXSLMYz7AvlDOsbQY-IES6Y8q7j90ReFN-CwajSStTFa3U

Mounting anger around the Family Law inquiry | The Spectator Australia When Scott Morrison announced the Family Law Inquiry he described it on Channel 7 as an opportunity, “to hear directly from families and listen to them as they give their accounts of how the family…

Hi to Everyone.

I do not see Barry Williams from the Lone Fathers Association of Australia on the attached Family Law Inquiry hearing schedule.

This is very, very strange.

John

Reason for De-Registration of the Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting).
Prior to the 2016 Federal election, most voters followed the how to vote cards for the Senate of the various political parties and just marked a single box above the line. This triggered the party's group voting ticket (a pre-assigned sequence of preferences). Only a few voters took the time and placed a number in every box below the line to allow them to assign their own preferences.
Important changes were made in 2016 to the method of voting in the Senate. The "above the line" group voting tickets were abolished and also optional preferential voting was introduced for both "above the line" and "below the line" voting. Both changes in voting procedure significantly reduced the impact of smaller political parties such as the Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting).
The ballot paper did continue to have a box for each party above a heavy line. This is with each party's candidates in a column below that party's box below the solid line. However as a result of these electoral changes made in 2016, voters were now able to assign their own preferences for parties "above the line". This is by numbering a minimum of six boxes above the line (and then as many boxes as they wished).
If voters chose to do so, they had the option of placing a number in every box, below the line. This was as previously done. However this was with the added change of the voter not being required to fill all of the boxes below the line. Therefore above and below the line voting now became optional preferential voting.
Without pre-assigned group voting by the political parties and the introduction of optional preferential voting, the allocation of voters's preferences were often found to be quite random. This made most smaller political parties, such as the Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting), virtually irrelevant in determining the outcome of Senate elections.

John Flanagan
http://www.equalparenting.org.au/

Non Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting) | …because children need both parents

Reposted - well said.
Ray Thompson
15 hrs ·
Over 4000 men die each year in Australia plus countless mums and kids. Where are the protesters, shows how much they are worth. Family Court, CSA absolute criminals getting away with it, every person working in these departments should be charged with murder or manslaughter, now go out and protest over real issues.

Reposted Damien Twigg
Admin · 7 hrs
This is a really worrying detail from the spokesman for the federal attorney general.
In fact its really bad news for proper family court reform if you are an alienated parent.
Basicly the spokesman, when discussing reforms with the ABC is clearly only focused on the previous ALRC enquiry and its 60 plus reccomdations rather then including and discussing the Senate enquiry as its basis for change.
The senate enquiry was touted as the voice of the people and was supposed to be superseding the "lawyers only" based enquiry and yet here's the truth from the horses mouth , the ALRC enquiry is still the goverments focus for the reforms, not the "dangerous and controversial Pauline Hanson inquiry "
I was very hopeful the Morrison goverment was serious about real reform but this to me indicates their priority is, and always has been the ALRC reforms.

Family Law Express Decisions | A free online family law resource

Violence at Figtree Grove Shopping Centre, Wollongong. https://www.facebook.com/9News/videos/244191593463694/ Teenage girls film sickening attack on youngster lured to the shopping centre: Social media allegedly to blame for violence. This is my local shopping Centre.

http://www.equalparenting.org.au/other-policies/

Essential Changes That We Require To Existing Laws | Non Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting)

http://www.familylawexpress.com.au/family-law-news/children/childcustody/sharedparenting/family-court-issues-warning-to-parents-planning-on-exploiting-covid-19-situation/4223/

Family Court issues warning to parents planning on exploiting COVID-19 situation The Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia, Will Alstergren, has a warning for any parent planning on abusing their custody situation during the COVID-19 pandemic.